Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Need to be SMARTer over science

By Dennis Jensen - posted Wednesday, 28 May 2014


What is this saying to those who might want to become mathematicians, physicists or chemists, hard sciences that are already in crisis?

These questions are valid and important. They need to be examined thoroughly and explained to members of the science community and the general public. These policies affect all of us.

As an aside, the PM asked me to draw up recommendations on science to improve the area, saying that I was the most interested in science in parliament.

Advertisement

I consulted widely, and worked hard on the recommendations, which I presented a few months ago.

They are now up on my website for anyone who wishes to see them.

What is the most troubling is that I see no evidence to suggest an improvement in science policy.

In fact, the reverse would appear to be the case, and not only are we not putting in place policy to improve science, but we are putting disincentives in place to people who might consider careers in the hard sciences and maths.

I am not saying that the likes of CSIRO, ANSTO etc should not be subject to review and restructure.

Far from it, I believe that there are issues that need to be addressed, and once again I refer people to my webpage for some suggestions in that regard.

Advertisement

However, it is foolish to have such a policy disincentive, while at the same time massively incentivising medical research.

This is about our national interest, and how to maximise economic and other benefits to our nation.

There appears to be a lack of understanding of how science works.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All

This is an edited extract of Dennis Jensen's speech to the parliament last night.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

8 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Dennis Jensen is the Liberal federal member for Tangney in Western Australia. A former air traffic controller, CSIRO and later Defence research scientist, and defence analyst, he was widely recognised as one of the rising stars on John Howard’s backbench. He’s played an important part in Australia’s air capability debate.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Dennis Jensen

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Dennis Jensen
Article Tools
Comment 8 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy