If a year ago you had asked someone in the US whether a George Bush Presidency was going to be a good time for those who oppose the death penalty you would have got a hearty laugh. Most people would have replied it was not too likely, about as
likely as the Supreme Court deciding an election result, or two US military vehicles with the most sophisticated radar capabilities in the world randomly colliding with foreign vessels in the middle of nowhere. . .
But as it happens, those of us who are committed to the abolition of capital punishment have more reason to celebrate than at any time in at least the last decade. George Ryan, the conservative and pro-death penalty Governor of Illinois
declared a moratorium on the death penalty in his state last year after 13 death row inmates were found to be innocent. Since then a number of state legislatures have got on the moratorium bandwagon, even a Senate Committee in Texas! Support for
a nation-wide moratorium on capital punishment has never been stronger, some polls put it as high as two-thirds of Americans, and exists across the political spectrum.
More states are moving to ban executions of the mentally retarded and the Supreme Court is soon to hear arguments that executing the mentally retarded should be constitutionally prohibited as "cruel and unusual punishment". Stories
about convicting the innocent and the unfair administration of the death penalty are no longer just the province of liberal newspapers like The New York Times but appear in popular newspapers and TV shows like USA Today and Dateline, sometimes
even on tabloid press and television. Basically, the death penalty just isn't very cool here any more.
There seems to be some consensus on the reasons for the eroding enthusiasm for death in the US. Some of it can be put down to international pressure. Government leaders in Europe and South America have repeatedly criticized US practices at
highly publicized summits and the US administration of the death penalty has been castigated in a number of decisions by the European Court of Human Rights. Many believe that European frustration over the US use of the death penalty motivated the
recent eviction of the US from the UN Human Rights Commission. Risking an onslaught of fugitive-migration, Canada now refuses to extradite fugitives to the US unless assurances are given that the US government will not seek the death penalty.
But Americans are not known to be too concerned about what the rest of the world thinks and thus mostly the change has occurred because of evolving attitudes within the country. Americans are uncomfortable with the relentless barrage of
statistics which confirm that blacks are vastly more likely to receive the death punishment than whites, especially if the victim is white. Many people wince at stories of mentally retarded prisoners going to their deaths having saved a portion
of their last meal "for later" or telling prison guards they would "see them tomorrow". Media reports emphasizing the vast error rate in capital trials are regularly juxtaposed with stories of lawyers who attend death trials
dead drunk or who snore through vital testimony. More people than ever are becoming familiar with the typical profile of a death row inmate: black or Hispanic, dirt poor, usually mentally ill or retarded with a history of neglect and violent
abuse during childhood and attached to the worst trial lawyer ever to lend their name to a 1800 number.
But more than anything else it has been the risk it poses to the innocent. As DNA testing rolls through the criminal justice system like a truth-seeking missile, or at least gets used a lot more than before, it is impossible to ignore the huge
numbers of innocents being found on death row. According to a CNN/Gallup poll, 80% of Americans now believe an innocent person has been executed in the US in the past five years. Odds-on they are right given the 96 death row inmates found
actually innocent since 1976. While many death penalty advocates are prepared to stand by the system - most are fond of the expression "you have to break a few eggs to make an omelet" - the average American is becoming a little queasy
as the broken shells of innocent men continue to pile up like some bizarre Humpty-Dumpty nightmare.
Intriguingly, the President seems unaffected by these developments. For a man who presided over the most prolific death machine in the country and who, during the Presidential debates, seemed to have an enthusiasm for the death penalty that
bordered on the downright creepy, he has done little to defend the current system. Not that it would be too easy to defend. After holding up the Texas justice system as a model for America it must be a little embarrassing to see people on death
row in Texas being declared innocent more often than Dick Cheney has heart attacks. And of course Bush has other things on his mind - a possible global economic recession, war in the Middle East, a China standoff and spectacular Alaskan wildlife
reserves going provocatively 'unmined' - but it seems safe to assume that Bush is not going to rush in to save the death penalty from its current malaise.
This is not to say there is not a long way to go. Polls indicate that general public approval of the death penalty is at its lowest ebb in 20 years, plunging from 85% to 60%, but obviously the penalty still enjoys majority support. Support
will rise further as the country approaches the execution of Oklahoma Bomber Timothy McVeigh, the kind of person many people argue that the death penalty exists for. But it is a time of relative calm and optimism, a time when politicians and
public advocates can voice concern over the administration of death without automatically being derided as bleeding hearted wimps who are soft on crime. It also seems like a good time to reflect upon the rest of the justice system in the US and
the impact that the death penalty has had upon it.
The thing about having a punishment as extreme as death is that it makes all other punishment pale in comparison. The most obvious example in the US is the sentence Life Without Parole (LWP). This sentence is inexcusable in a civilized
country. In many states LWP is not just a fixed time period like 25 years but a literal life sentence. You are telling someone they will grow old and die, in prison. There are vast numbers of men and women serving LWP sentences in the US and in
many states a capital murder conviction has only two available sentences - death or LWP.
Many anti-death penalty advocates concede that LWP prisoners are the real victims of the death penalty. But they concede this quietly and privately. In public they actively support the penalty. Juries are considerably less likely to sentence
an inmate to death if LWP is the other option. Numerous opinion polls show that death penalty support will drop considerably if the alternative sentence is assured LWP.
For capital defenders getting the sentence LWP is a good result. In jury trials defenders will emphasize the punishment to jurors, some pointing out that many think LWP is really worse than death. If they can get a prosecutor to agree to drop
the death penalty they will often encourage a client to plead guilty. This can happen even if the defendant has a strong claim of actual innocence. In fact, some death row inmates pursuing claims of actual innocence have been offered LWP instead
of clemency, and accepted. Its not like they have much choice. In some ways the position of a defendant who never faces the death penalty but who is threatened with LWP is even worse. At least a potential death row inmate has a chance of
eventually getting a decent lawyer.
The extremity of the death punishment and the difficulty of conducting capital trials are considerable obstacles but the work also holds a certain glamour. Some of the best lawyers in the US are capital defenders working at volunteer capital
defense centers. They are overworked and barely paid at all but they are brilliant, charismatic and driven. The centers can't handle every death-eligible case and they often inherit cases after trial conviction, sometimes files are little more
than scribbles on a bar napkin, but they will win half or even two-thirds of all their appeal cases.