Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Pyne good to his word on Gonski

By Kevin Donnelly - posted Friday, 29 November 2013


It's no secret that parents are voting with their feet and flocking to non-government schools, proven by the fact that over a 10 years period enrolments grew by 20% while government schools flat lined at 1%.

It's also true that the reason why parents want Catholic and independent schools is because they are autonomous and, unlike state schools, are not controlled by governments and their bureaucracies.

The fact that the Gonski report argues in favour of school autonomy and giving schools the freedom to manage their own affairs and the fact that the Rudd government's model destroys this freedom is being ignored by journalists.

Advertisement

One only needs to read the ALP government's roadmap for Australian education, the National Education Reform Agreement and related National School Improvement Plan, to find evidence of Canberra's plan to takeover Australia's non-government schools.

As a condition of funding under the Rudd government's model every school across Australia must teach the national curriculum, do the national literacy and numeracy tests and adopt Canberra's approach to training and registering teachers.

Teachers and schools complain of excessive red tape and micromanagement – you can expect this command and control model to get a lot worse if the Rudd model is implemented.

Judged by the hysterical reaction to Minister Pyne's statement that Rudd's funding model, otherwise known as Gonski light, will be reviewed next year you'd think he had said something new.

Wrong. During the recent election campaign the Coalition promised, if elected to government, to maintain the same level of funding for the first 4 years as would have been received under Gonski light.

The Coalition policy also promised a review of the Rudd government's funding model, contained in the Australian Education Act, in order to promote greater autonomy at the school level and to promote greater diversity, flexibility and choice.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Kevin Donnelly is a Senior Research Fellow at the Australian Catholic University and he recently co-chaired the review of the Australian national curriculum. He can be contacted at kevind@netspace.net.au. He is author of Australia’s Education Revolution: How Kevin Rudd Won and Lost the Education Wars available to purchase at www.edstandards.com.au

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Kevin Donnelly

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Kevin Donnelly
Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy