Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Protecting the weak: put an air and sea carbon levy back on the table

By Jack Bennetto - posted Wednesday, 27 November 2013


Funds raised from a price on aviation and shipping could ensure the implementation of further projects that protect the livelihoods of developing populations most at risk of the effects of climate change.

And the financial impacts of such a levy are unlikely to be large for consumers. For instance, a charge of $25 per tonne of carbon would only raise the price of air tickets by an estimated 2-4 per cent.

All developed countries at the climate talks, excluding the US, Australia, and some countries classified as developing such as Singapore and Mexico, support the idea of using revenues. However, almost all developing countries are worried about the impacts that such measures could have on trade and tourism and therefore their development.

Advertisement

Compensating developing countries for this economic harm is critical to the acceptability of bunker fuel levies. Such compensation would require, at most, 40 per cent of revenue, which would leave around USD $23 billion for climate finance and other uses.

As countries converge at the UN climate talks, the rapidity of emissions growth and plans to combat this trend form the cornerstone of the talks. At the same time, the urgent need for substantial finance to fund adaptation in developing countries is being fervently discussed in the meeting rooms and corridors of the National Stadium where the talks are being held.

Unfortunately, an international agreement on bunker fuels has recently been swept off the table, partly due to Australia's refusal to pledge any additional climate finance. Yet to reach the goal of USD $100 billion by 2020 real action must be taken.

A more constructive approach to the provision of climate finance should be adopted by Australia and other rich countries as the negotiations move to Peru in 2014. In line with these commitments, Australia and other countries should support a decision to invite the International Maritime Organisation and International Civil Aviation Organisation to implement carbon pricing.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

19 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Jack Bennetto is a student at The Australian National University and is a Global Voices youth delegateto the 2013 UNFCCC.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 19 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy