Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Australian primary English curricula and their planned exclusions

By Chris Nugent - posted Thursday, 31 October 2013


Correct spelling is at least 50% of every basic literacy task. All words do have to be written accurately before we can require students to read them. Yet the most recent Australia wide test of the spelling for age skills of Australian school children occurred all the way back in 1936: a distance of precisely 11 entire primary school generations (!) As I explained in my earlier article (and will explain more fully in a later article) Australia's yearly national NAPLAN tests do not conventionally test student spelling skills.

There is no excuse for this longstanding nationwide failure in the survey testing of spelling skill: via a radio or television program, government education authorities could, at least theoretically, test all school students in Australia in a matter of only 20 minutes. This would probably make it the most inexpensive and thorough national literacy survey of the lot.

Then why hasn't this been done, you ask? All too likely, the survey testing of English spelling skills in this way would arm Australia's many parent and lobby groups with far too much highly relevant data.

Advertisement

Notwithstanding, when there have been no new national school based standards set for English spelling skill in a period of 77 years, how can any modern Australian school stake a claim to excellence or even normality in its spelling skill?

The disqualification of Australia's literacy curriculum writers

Let's quickly summarize this article. The 'literacy basics' that most politicians in living memory have promised to push our schools to get back to, comprise a total of only 3 basic skills. These 3 skills have been deliberately de-emphasised to points of extinction by all Australian education authorities. During the course of over a century, the first 2 of these skills have not even once been systematically surveyed by any school system in Australia. The third skill, spelling, was last nationally survey tested 77 years ago.

So when it comes to the essential testing and teaching of the 'literacy basics' in Australian schools, Australia's English curriculum writers in all the high places are much worse off than merely out of date. Even in the October of 2013, they remain deliberately ignorant of the 3 most vital skills that are critically relevant to the success of the very literacy curricula that they disseminate among Australian teachers of literacy.

How did Australian English curriculum writers manage to so completely lose sight of the literacy basics?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

8 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Chris Nugent is a retired specialist teacher. He is the author of Planned Illiteracy in Australia : The Very Clear Evidence.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Chris Nugent

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 8 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy