Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

How to lose the 'Christian vote' in three hours

By Adam Ch'ng - posted Thursday, 5 September 2013

If there is actually such thing as the "Christian vote", on Monday night, Kevin Rudd lost it.

For many, the Prime Minister's spirited defence of same sex marriage on Q&A was a watershed moment. Professor Kerryn Phelps hailed it as "an historical moment in Australian politics" and penned a 475 word article of thanks to the Prime Minister. For Professor Phelps and so many other LGBTIQ voters, this was the "sweetest victory of all".

And yet for so many Christians voters, this was the moment that the sheep's clothing came off the wolf's back.


At 7.30pm that night, in excess of 35,000 Christians gathered across 339 churches in every State and Territory to watch the Prime Minister and Opposition Leader address the Christian constituency. Not yet knowing what was to come, many of us sympathised with the Prime Minister's apparently genuine admission that:

many in the Christian churches may be disappointed with some of the decisions that I have taken as Prime Minister or as a person. I have also undertaken those decisions in good and prayerful conscience, even though people in equal prayerful conscience may disagree with some of those conclusions.

If the night had ended there, many of us would have been disappointed but at least sympathetic towards the Prime Minister's clumsy attempt to navigate through a complex moral minefield. What came next, no one could foresee.

Not more than three hours later, the Prime Minister publicly crucified a mainstream Christian pastor for questioning his backflip on marriage policy. Instead of the "gentle Kevin meek and mild" of 7.30pm, the Prime Minister not only failed to directly answer the question but he mercilessly lambasted the pastor whose personal views were irrelevant to his response.

According to the Anglican Archbishop of Sydney Glenn Davies, "Kevin Rudd was profoundly wrong in his understanding of the Bible. He misquoted the Bible and attributed to the Bible something that Aristotle said (that slavery is a natural condition)." While the Prime Minister's gross distortion of Biblical truth was deeply concerning, it was his modus operandi and treatment of the Christian church that was offensive.

In retrospect, the Prime Minister's apparently gracious words of 7.30pm were akin to Judas' kiss before his 10.30pm betrayal. Voters can forgive a Prime Minister for changing his or her mind on even an important policy issue. On Monday night however, Kevin Rudd treated every Christian voter in Australia with absolute contempt.


Far from being some moment of great integrity and strong leadership, the Prime Minister's visceral attack on the Christian church was nothing more than cheap political opportunism. It was this Prime Minister's attempt at creating his own "misogyny speech", with the same confected moral outrage against a fictitious straw man. It was political desperation on steroids.

With the ALP heading for electoral wipe out on Saturday, the Prime Minister's attempt at leveraging the same sex marriage debate as a Hail Mary pass was always doomed to fail. It has irreparably damaged his once close relationship with the Christian constituency across Australia.

In fact, over the course of the election campaign, the Prime Minister has gradually severed ties with the people with whom he once identified so closely in 2009. According to former ALP Senator John Black, the Prime Minister has neglected the "young working-class families in the outer suburbs, many of whom go to church and believe in God…frankly, I haven't seen Kevin Rudd talking to those people a lot during the course of this campaign."

In June 2010, Kevin Rudd was torn down by his own party over his mismanagement of the emissions trading scheme and resource super profits tax. His gross lack of political judgment cost him the confidence of his Gang of Four and caucus. Unfortunately, that same lack of judgment appears to have motivated his neglect of vast swathes of the electorate who once supported Kevin07.

Joe de Bruyn, National Secretary of the Shop Distributive and Allied Employees Association cautioned that "Labor runs the risk that people who traditionally vote Labor will not vote Labor because they don't like the (same sex marriage) issue. …So Labor is actually running the risk, the more they prioritise this, people will vote against it."

On Monday, the Prime Minister ran that risk and crashed through. So this Saturday, he should crucify any expectation of political salvation.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

41 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Adam Ch’ng is studying theology at Ridley College, Melbourne and is a former adviser to the Leader of the Government in the Senate, Senator the Hon Eric Abetz.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Adam Ch'ng

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 41 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy