Bush's letter made absolutely clear America's appreciation of what Israel's disengagement proposal involved:
The United States appreciates the risks such an undertaking represents.
The risks envisaged in 2004 could not have foreseen the disastrous consequences for Israel and for the Palestinian Arabs in 2007 - when Gaza and the West Bank were divided into two separate and warring fiefdoms - still controlled in 2013 by two unelected and inimical foes heading two organisations - the PLO and Hamas - that both have the same objective - the destruction of the Jewish State of Israel.
Advertisement
What is particularly intriguing is whether Secretary of State Kerry's reported remarks to the congressmen amount to cherry picking of parts of the Bush letter or whether America intends to honour a third commitment to Israel contained in that letter:
It seems clear that an agreed, just, fair and realistic framework for a solution to the Palestinian refugee issue as part of any final status agreement will need to be found through the establishment of a Palestinian state, and the settling of Palestinian refugees there, rather than in Israel.
These three conditions have been vigorously rejected by the PLO in previous negotiations.
In the tug of war that the current ongoing negotiations will involve - America's position on these three commitments made to Israel will become crucial.
If America stands by its above commitments - then the PLO will have to make some very painful concessions if the negotiations are to be successfully concluded.
I guess the leaking of another private conversation will let us know whether the the PLO has caved in this time around.
Advertisement
Stay tuned.
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.
16 posts so far.