Fact-checking Australia's likely next PM

Tony Abbott's latest speech confirms fact-checking in federal politics remains a faraway fantasy.

At a time when good faith would seem pretty important, the man who would be Australia's leader frequently makes statements contradicted by the evidence.

This despite so-called fact-checkers at Channel Seven, the Conversation and coming soon to the ABC.

Mr Abbott's address to the Australia-Israel Chamber of Commerce in Melbourne on Monday of last week contained about twenty readily identifiable falsehoods. Some are well-worn favourites from earlier speeches. Plus fresh ones as well.

Here's a top twelve.

1. "The Howard/Costello Government … presided over what now seems like a golden age of prosperity – that's been lost."

On most indicators, Australia is much wealthier now than 2007 – despite the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression. Indicators include income per person, pensions, superannuation, productivity and personal savings – all much higher now.

Plus interest rates, inflation and tax levels – all lower. This is affirmed by international credit ratings, the value of the Aussie dollar and quality of life indices – all much better now.

2. "By contrast, the Rudd/Gillard Government has not just failed to continue this bipartisan legacy of [economic and workplace] reform; it's reversed it."

Nonsense. Heritage Foundation's economic freedom index reflects progress in freeing capitalists from government obstruction. Its latest survey ranks Australia first among Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) nations and third in the world. Australia's current score is higher than the Coalition ever achieved.

3. "GDP growth per head has been just one third of the Howard era."

This is a subtle porky, but a porky nonetheless. The essential dishonesty is denying the impact of the global financial crisis (GFC) which devastated economies and reversed GDP growth worldwide.

The average annual increase in Australia's gross domestic product was 3.65% during the 11 Howard years. Then down to 2.44% under Labor. So it is not down to one third, more like two thirds.

But here's the deceit: Australia's average growth through the Howard years was matched or bettered by several other economies. The USA averaged 3.04%. Canada 3.3%. Some European countries were higher. Luxembourg averaged 4.78%.

Then came the GFC. All economies were clobbered. In Labor's five years, growth has been 2.44%. But in the USA 0.54%, Canada 0.94% and Luxembourg 0.52%. And the Euro Zone negative 2.3%!

4. "Australia's fundamental strengths owe far more to the reforms of previous governments than to the spending spree of the current one."

Evidence affirms the opposite. Most recently, a UNICEF paper by Bruno Martorano shows that while Europe's austerity measures worsened their economies, Australia's prompt spending "limited the possible negative effects caused by the macroeconomic shock and favoured the process of economic recovery."

5. "Australia's debt position is better than that of some other countries – not because we've done better, but because we started better."

Not true. If it were, then other nations with no debt and strong budgets surpluses should have done well through the GFC. And nations deeply in debt and deficit would have done poorly.

There is no such correlation. Several countries which emerged from the GFC in good shape went in with huge debts at the outset. These include Israel, Switzerland and Singapore.

In contrast, Spain, Finland, Iceland and Chile all had modest debt and budget surpluses in 2008 yet suffered severe reversals.

6. "Sure, our economic position is stronger than that of the United Kingdom and much better than that of Greece and Italy and Spain, and France; but so was Ireland's until quite recently."

Coalition spokespersons often suggest snidely that "Sure, Australia is doing better than Greece, Italy, Spain and Ireland". Australia is in fact doing better than every economy. Economists debate whether Canada or Switzerland is second. But no-one challenges Australia's position as world leader – and forging further ahead with each quarter's results.

7. "It's good that Mr Rudd … committed the Government to a new effort to boost productivity … but he's never actually taken the steps needed to convert aspiration into achievement."

False. The data shows productivity increased dramatically for four quarters in 2009, despite the GFC. It stalled in 2010 as the global downturn hit businesses badly. Since 2010, productivity has increased for a record nine consecutive quarters to an all-time high.

8, 9, 10. "Tax reform starts with abolishing the carbon tax and the mining tax, which have done so much to spook investors, threaten jobs and hurt every family's cost of living."

Three fibs in one sentence. Investment in Australia has not been impacted by the carbon tax. Total numbers of people employed have risen every quarter since the tax was introduced. And inflation is currently 2.4%. This is below the rate for most of the Labor period prior to the carbon tax, and below the rate for most of the last five Howard years.

11. "Based on previous experience we are confident that these changes will produce a million new jobs within five years … unlike the anaemic job creation record of the past six years."

More than one million jobs have been created since 2007, a record unmatched in comparable nations. The UK, with a population and an economy three times Australia's managed 656,000 extra jobs in that period. The unemployment rate in Australia is 5.7%. In the UK it is 7.8%. In the Euro Area 12.2%.

12. "At the Press Club recently, Mr Rudd declared that the mining boom was over and that Australia needed to be ready for life afterwards."

False. Mr Rudd specifically affirmed that "the China resources boom is over". There is a difference. Australia has other customers.

Rio Tinto reports that first half 2013 iron ore production set a new first half record, driven by sustained productivity improvements, and 2013 sales set a new record for a first half at two per cent higher than in 2012.

There are other untruths in the speech. But there's a start. Questions arising include these:

How many of the above are deliberate lies and how many reflect genuine misinformation? What do Mr Abbott's colleagues – many of whom identify with faith communities which believe strongly in truthfulness – make of this pattern of behaviour?

And where are Australia's fact-checkers and what are they doing?