Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Making the world safe for predators

By Valerie Yule - posted Wednesday, 29 May 2013


I remember in Britain an exercise in the primary school curriculum presenting in a sympathetic light a mink escaped from a mink farm - and helping them escape is a prominent concern of Animal Liberationists. Whether they should be in mink farms or not is one thing - I think not - but one place they should not be is in the British countryside, eradicating more of the other wildlife and also farm-life, than you could imagine even such vicious little creatures are capable of - damage including wiping out creatures that kept down smaller pests, and ruining riverbanks.

Certainly crocodiles should be a protected species in some proclaimed places, to avoid extinction - but to have them protected as more important than other forms of life including man seems going a bit far. There are also places where wedge-tailed eagles are not farmers' friends.

Lions and tigers are favourites for animal parks today - people drive through in cages (cars) to see them 'in the wild'. Imagine a scenario of really wild animals going wild again, including wolves, which are sometimes needed to cull the deer, but not otherwise

Advertisement

Dangerous dogs are kept because of dangerous men - and by dangerous men. There is the problem. But there are other dogs which are affectionate, and good guard dogs, without importing a new terror for children and old ladies. Freedom from fear is mocked when women, children and old men are afraid of going down the street. 'Safe in the right hands' - but what of the wrong ones.

Of course this goes for cars, guns and sex too - we arent making any of these outright illegal either. But we need all three and do not have adequate substitutes. And there are good animal substitutes that are every bit as sweet and affectionate and pretty as bull-terriers. Encourage them - or a nasty future.

The nasty people get nasty dogs, pythons and crocodiles - and then let them go wild in the bush, killing off everything.

The nice people protect all our native wild-life regardless. In our reserve, the Australian raven terrorises the other birds and dive-bombs the smaller dogs. Protected. Who dare send them away?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

16 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Valerie Yule is a writer and researcher on imagination, literacy and social issues.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Valerie Yule

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Valerie Yule
Article Tools
Comment 16 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy