Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

The Assault on the public

By Marko Beljac - posted Tuesday, 14 May 2013

Just about everything with the word “public” in front of it is under attack. Public education, public health, public housing, public transport, public corporations, public sphere, public libraries and so on.

We say just about everything for some things, crucially but also instructively, are to be left out from our list. Public bailout of banks, public bailout of investors, and public subsidy for high technology industry are all excluded.

If something with the word “public “in front of it is designed to serve “the public,” understood as the broad mass of the population, then it’s under attack. If it is meant as public subsidy for, and bailout of, the rich then it flourishes.


This suggests that it is the public itself that is under attack, both literally and conceptually. 

The increases in inequality in the advanced industrial economies during the neoliberal era show us that the public have been under attack for the rich have gotten richer in the past 30 years by extracting resources from, and by lowering their obligations to, the wider population. This was achieved by wage restraint, lower corporate and high end taxes, lower social welfare spending, and the attack on public goods provision.

The dominant narrative on inequality is that the economic dynamism unleashed by neoliberal deregulation has, regrettably perhaps, fostered inequality alongside economic growth. Despite the recent emphasis on the issue this narrative has not changed. Focus is directed at the failure of the trickle down effect to distribute the proceeds of economic growth down to the masses.

Yet this ignores the crucial point that trend rates of economic growth during the neoliberal era are almost half of what they were during the post war Keynesian era. It is not uneven distribution of economic growth that has led to the rise in inequality.

Rather, it is the assault on the public that has led to a redistribution of resources and wealth away from the public toward the upper class in a period characterised by lower economic growth.

This assault on the public also entailed an attack on the very idea of “the public.” This offensive was facilitated by the rise to dominance of neoclassical economic theory with its view that society, to the extent that there is “such a thing” as society, is a self-organised system composed of rational utility maximising individuals. A rational society is a society that frames public policy with reference to such ideas, we are led to believe.  A society of rational individuals that “forgets all but self” is a rational one, and niceties such as social justice are chimerical and irrational.


There are many things that we may say about this, but it is useful to focus on three aspects. Namely, how did democratic societies attack their own population? What does this tell us about the role of the state in neoliberal practice? How much intellectual worth does the neoliberal system of ideas have that assaults the very concept of “the public?”

Public discourse by now is dominated by the dismal science. We can see this by observing how economists, especially financial market economists, have enjoyed a privileged role in public debate. Yet the story of the past 30 years is as much a political story as it is an economic story. The shift to free markets in the neoliberal era had to be facilitated through political action; without Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher there is “no such thing” as neoliberalism bar words on paper.

Neoliberal ideas could be used to attack the public only because democracy itself came under attack. Aristotle, who possessed one of history’s keenest pair of eyes, observed that a democratic society could only function in a society characterised by economic equality.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

11 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mark Beljac teaches at Swinburne University of Technology, is a board member of the New International Bookshop, and is involved with the Industrial Workers of the World, National Tertiary Education Union, National Union of Workers (community) and Friends of the Earth.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Marko Beljac

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Marko Beljac
Article Tools
Comment 11 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy