That is the sentiment, passionately and meaningfully expressed.
The Prime Minister talks about strength, but from time to time, real
strength and purpose in national leadership comes from saying 'no' to
another country, which is what Mr Howard should have said to the Americans
instead of committing Australia to forward deployment and the
inevitability of war in Iraq. But he is too weak, and behind him sits a
weak and ineffective backbench. It has been left to the elder statesmen of
the Liberal Party to articulate a true "small-l liberal"
position. Mr Howard and his government are just yes-men to the United
States, a conga line of suckholes on the conservative side of Australian
politics. The backbench sucks up to the Prime Minister, and the Prime
Minister sucks up to George Bush - and they have the hide to call
themselves Australians. In my book, they are not Australian at all.
Australia deserves better than to have an American apologist as its
Prime Minister; than to have someone who is too weak to say no to Uncle
Sam. In his statement to the parliament, the Prime Minister dismissed the
opposition to war as 'just anti-American prejudice'. Imagine, the member
for Bennelong lecturing us about prejudice: the same Member of Parliament
who opposed sanctions against South Africa, who wanted to cut Asian
immigration, who opposed the Mabo judgment tooth and nail, who welcomed
Pauline Hanson's first speech in this place as an outbreak of free speech.
He still refuses to say sorry to the stolen generation and, to this day,
cannot bear to utter the word "multiculturalism". This bloke has
a PhD in prejudice; he has no right to be lecturing anyone else.
Advertisement
I would argue that opposition to the government's strategy is not a
form of anti-American prejudice; it is an expression of Australia's
national interest. I believe there is a new nationalism in this country -
the sort of nationalism that says that Australia should be part of the
international community, and engage with other countries - but with a very
clear sense of our interests. Australians are saying that we are not a
little colony or junior nation any more, but a mature nation that takes a
mature view about our interests. The right-wing elite opinion in this
country is out of sync with public opinion; with the new nationalism that
stands tall in this nation.
We should now approach the United States with an independent foreign
policy that puts our interests first. We can have a defensive military
alliance with the US, but we do not have to stand shoulder to shoulder
with them in every single conflict and on every single international
issue. Just as there were no American boots on the ground in East Timor,
there should be no Australian ground forces in Iraq. Even if the UN
sanctions some form of military action, Australia's commitment should be
limited. I strongly endorse the Australian Labor Party policy statements
of April 2002 and 15 November 2002, the latter of which states that
"... in light of the threat to Australia from terrorist organisations
operating in South East Asia, the priority for the deployment of
Australian military resources must lie within our own region."
The Iraqi regime is not a direct threat to Australia. We must deal with
the threat in our own part of the world first. We have higher priorities
to pursue in the war against terror. I oppose the Prime Minister's
strategy, his toadying to the United States, the way in which he is
leaving us defenceless, and pushing fridge magnets into the front-line of
our nation's defence while sending our SAS and other commandos to the
other side of the world. He ought to be ashamed of himself. I believe he
has disgraced our great nation and placed its future security and safety
at risk. Every year, each and every one of us as members of parliament
says, in remembrance of past wars, "lest we forget". The truth
is that the Prime Minister has forgotten: how to stand up for Australia's
national interests; how to keep our lives safe and secure; and how to be a
good Australian, instead of some yes-man to a flaky and dangerous American
president. I reject his blind rush to war with Iraq, and I trust and
dearly hope that in time, the Australian people themselves will reject
this Prime Minister and his government.
This is an edited transcript of a speech to Parliament.
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.