Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Neo-liberalism and illicit drug liberalization: a natural alliance?

By Philip Mendes - posted Monday, 22 April 2013


Following the talk, CIS Executive Director Greg Lindsay commented coyly: "CIS is undecided in its position on the matter, but wholeheartedly supports open and tolerant discussion on this issue, which profoundly affects the lives of so many people".

Similarly, the IPA has published a number of strong statements in favour of drug liberalisation including a significant argument in favour of providing heroin to registered addicts by former Liberal Party MP John Hyde. But equally, it has given space to the zero tolerance view favoured by social conservatives such as Australian Family Association spokesperson Bill Muehlenberg.

However, the current IPA Research Fellow Chris Berg seems to be a particularly vigorous supporter of drug law reform. Berg was one of the participants in the recent Australia 21 roundtable which resulted in a report stating the case for an end to prohibition. Berg has also authored a number of papers identifying prohibition as a failure, and urging consideration of decriminalisation or legalisation in order to minimise drug-related harm. He argues that the war on drugs is "not against drugs, but against drug users".

Advertisement

Conclusion

We currently live in a political climate which highlights the promotion of individual choice and agency, and the right of communities to identify diverse solutions to social needs and problems. This climate seems to provide an opportunity for considering some badly needed new directions in illicit drug policies. Neo-liberals who are true to their philosophical principles in favour of a free market for all goods and services including illicit drugs can and should play an important role in facilitating policy reform.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Associate Professor Philip Mendes is the Director of the Social Inclusion and Social Policy Research Unit in the Department of Social Work at Monash University and is the co-author with Nick Dyrenfurth of Boycotting Israel is Wrong (New South Press), and the author of a chapter on The Australian Greens and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict in the forthcoming Australia and Israel (Sussex Academic Press). Philip.Mendes@monash.edu

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Philip Mendes

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Philip Mendes
Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy