Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Australia: the Security Council

By Bruce Haigh - posted Monday, 22 April 2013

Australia is in a unique position to show leadership and initiative on the vexed question of North Korea. Using the influence that membership of the Security Council offers, Australia might seek to broker an ongoing UN based dialogue between the United States, China, South and North Korea and Japan.

Australia has a respected record within the international community for addressing and negotiating outcomes on difficult issues. These cover a range of matters, including nuclear proliferation, law of the sea, the Antarctic, apartheid, the environment and the visit to China in 1971 by Gough Whitlam, which helped pave the way for other western states to end China’s international isolation.

America is as much the problem as it is a solution in seeking resolution to the ongoing tensions on the Korean peninsula. Since the end of WWII the United States has relied on the threat of military force and the use of military force to underpin its diplomacy. As a result, the subtle art of negotiation, networking and the development of relationships has not flourished to the extent it might have had America not had so much wealth and raw power at its disposal. American diplomats exude a charm designed to deflect intimacy and defuse difficult dialogue, they were once adept at dealing with fawning foreigners, the times are changing but their diplomatic skills such as they were have not changed.


North Korea gives America cover for deploying sophisticated weaponry close to China. South Korea is a beneficiary of the American presence and limited largesse, but whilst it seems to understand the posturing of its neighbour, would, nonetheless, like to see a lessening of northern hysteria and a gradual normalisation of the relationship. Anything too rapid would swamp its economy.

China has moved on. It understands and can deal with its hyper-active little neighbour, but it has bigger fish to fry and does not want North Korea taking advantage of any move it might make to secure a pre-planned position in the region.

Japan is fed up with North Korea and China; it seeks certainty and predictability from its neighbours.

The family run, despotic, dictatorship, recently inherited by Kim Jong Un following the death of his father Kim Jong-iL, is noted for its human rights abuses and slavish forced obedience to the state by the much abused citizens of the Orwellian night-mare that is North Korea today. The founding grand- father Kim ll-sung is today given religious status by the military dominated communist party.

At the time Whitlam made his famous foray into the middle kingdom, it was a dark and tortured communist state, just emerging from the bloody and cruel Cultural Revolution instigated by the founding father, Mao Zedong, as a means of retaining his hold over the state.

Following the Whitlam visit, China slowly and unevenly began the process of engagement with the rest of the world and of modernisation of industries and cities. Over time it adopted many of the features of capitalism whilst retaining a central, single party, communist state.


Maybe with the right sort of diplomacy, North Korea, might be gradually induced toward more positive engagement towards it neighbours and the rest of the world. The place to start might well be the Security Council. Anything to do with diplomacy and North Korea is high risk, but Australia once had a capacity to undertake creative and front footed diplomacy. It is worth a try and there is not a lot for Australia to lose should it not produce results and a lot to be gained if it does.

North Korea is like the pound dog, there is little to be gained by kicking it when it bites or barks. It needs to learn some new responses through rewards rather than attempting to match its own bad behaviour. Rewards have been tried before but without dialogue.

The big stick has been wielded until it only provokes bared teeth and a frantic straining at the leash. North Korea has been subject to 14 adverse Security Council Resolutions, a record close to that of Apartheid South Africa.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

12 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Bruce Haigh is a political commentator and retired diplomat who served in Pakistan and Afghanistan in 1972-73 and 1986-88, and in South Africa from 1976-1979

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Bruce Haigh

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Bruce Haigh
Article Tools
Comment 12 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy