Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Should we force fluoride?

By Emily McAuliffe - posted Thursday, 18 April 2013


Even if fluoride does prove to be beneficial to our health, is it really that cost effective to wash our cars and dogs with it too? Not only do we have to drink it, we have to pay for it as well.

While maybe it seemed like an easy option to just load up the town water supply with fluoride and be done with it, for all these years perhaps a more sensible option would have been to develop targeted interventions that didn't have to impact everyone.

Moving forward, for instance, we could focus on parent education and appropriate subsidisation of fluoride products to support the dentition of children. And in the meantime, academics can move ahead with their research and work out whether governments mandating fluoridation are doing us a favour or causing us undue suffering.

Advertisement

Whether or not fluoride is a health revolution or failure is open to discussion, but the whole issue does make one question the ethics of health policies that dabble in murky water. If we're not convinced of the benefits of a health policy, maybe we should fight for the right to make our own decisions around the issue - especially when it comes to matters that divide both the academic and general community.

Even with the recent changes in Queensland that will allow the fluoridation debate to occur at a local level, at the end of the day, someone will have the power to make a call on the behalf of a community and decide what's best for their health. Whether they actually know what they're on about is anybody's guess.

So like it or not, we could be sipping daily cocktails of a poorly understood substance which may or may not be in our best interest. At least with a martini you know what you're getting yourself in to. It's a shame the same can't be said about fluoride.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

87 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Emily McAuliffe is a freelance writer in Brisbane who is completing a Master of Public Health.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Emily McAuliffe

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 87 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy