Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Fears over Queensland Government Workers Compensation review

By Mark O'Connor - posted Monday, 25 March 2013

Workers in Queensland have good reason to be uneasy about the Parliamentary Committee Enquiry by the Queensland Government into the State's workers' compensation system whose results will be handed down soon.

The enquiry's brief was to look at:

  • whether the 2010 changes to the workers' compensation scheme to water down common law entitlements of injured workers have reduced common law claim numbers;
  • WorkCover's current and future financial position;
  • the scheme's impact on the Queensland economy; and
  • Queensland's competitiveness and employment growth.

The Queensland workers' compensation scheme provides payment of statutory benefits to injured workers in the State. It also pays for the medical expenses for treatment and rehabilitation caused by injury at work.

It is a "short tail" scheme which provides for the payment of benefits until an injury is judged "stable and stationary". A claim cannot go more than five years and weekly benefits are capped at $200,000 over the life of the claim.

The scheme also provides workers the right to bring common law claims for damages for the pain, suffering, permanent impairment, loss of income and loss of earning capacity for injuries caused by negligent work accidents and unsafe work practices.

While workers' compensation premiums are a cost to business, it should be a comfort to employers in Queensland that the State has the second-lowest premiums in the country at 1.45 per cent of wages.

The only cheaper premium is in Victoria, which is at 1.29per cent of wages, but employers pay for the first two weeks of wages if a worker makes a claim or alternatively pays an increased premium. As the Queensland Law Society stated in its submission to the Parliamentary Enquiry, the Queensland and Victorian WorkCover premiums are therefore effectively about the same.

Despite this, it is feared that there is strong agitation from the government to push down the premium further, which would be coupled with reduced entitlements to injured workers.


If the State Government is serious about looking at increasing Queensland's competitiveness, in improving employment growth and helping the Queensland economy, it should look at repealing its regressive payroll tax which taxes employers with a payroll of more than $1.1 million at a rate of 4.75 per cent of the payroll. One would think there would be no greater disincentive to employers than to tax them for employing staff.

Despite this, it is believed that the government is looking at a number of changes to the WorkCover system in Queensland.

It is believed that part of the changes to the system is to follow the lead of New South Wales and to end the entitlement of workers to receive statutory benefits for injuries suffered whilst travelling to and from work.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mark O'Connor

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Mark O'Connor
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy