Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Multinational miners: magnanimous or malevolent?

By Kellie Tranter - posted Tuesday, 5 February 2013

Eritrea is one of the world’s poorest countries. The International Monetary Fund considers it a potential ‘Heavily Indebted Poor Country’, notwithstanding its natural resources endowment, which includes gold, silver, copper, zinc and potash.

Human Rights Watch recently released a report ‘Hear No Evil – Forced Labour and Corporate Responsibility in Eritrea’s Mining Sector’ which outlines Eritrea’s government’s abusive program of indefinite forced labour. It calls on governments, including Australia’s, to develop mechanisms that pay close attention to the human rights records of their companies when they operate in Eritrea.

Should the recommendations made by Human Rights Watch be limited to Eritrea?


It refers to Australia’s South Boulder Mines as “actively moving ahead with plans to develop new mines in Eritrea” and says that the head of South Boulder, David Hughes, expressed no awareness of the human rights risks involved in his company’s Eritrea operations and indicated that the company had not yet taken any measures to avoid the risks highlighted by Human Rights Watch.

Human Rights Watch recommends implementing legal frameworks, such as a local independent ombudsman, that allow government institutions to monitor the human rights performance of domestic companies when they operate abroad in areas that carry serious human rights risks; to take steps to regulate the human rights conduct of domestic companies operating abroad in complex environments, such as requiring companies to carry out human rights due diligence activity; and to communicate an expectation to the government of Eritrea that companies investing in the mining sector there should be able to implement the outlined recommendations.

How is Australia’s track record in other African countries?

‘Africa Down Under’, last year’s speech by Foreign Minister Bob Carr, confirms that Australia has about 200 Australian companies involved in 650 projects in 37 countries, including Malawi, Mozambique, Mali, Guinea, Democratic Republic of Congo, Botswana, Niger, Burkina Faso, Liberia and Namibia.

Many of these countries ranked poorly in Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index last year and most, despite their vast mineral wealth, find themselves a part of the International Monetary Fund’s Heavily Indebted Poor Countries program which, according to U.S. embassy cables published by news organisation WikiLeaks, requires them to devalue their currencies and free their economic markets and foreign exchange rates.

It’s hardly coincidental that policies like these give multi-national corporations more bang for their buck if they are in the market for precious minerals and resources.


Rather than being a source of self-congratulatory braggadocio, the nature and locations of Australian companies’ operations should invite scrutiny to ensure that they are not complicit in corrupt conduct, environmental despoliation or human rights abuses.

That is why the recommendations made by Human Rights Watch come at a critical time. With rising mineral and commodity prices, high levels of corruption and low levels of accountability and transparency, internal displacement of people, climate change, water scarcity and deficient local mining and environmental legislation, efforts must be made by the Australian Government to protect the human rights, the environment and social conditions.


  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Kellie Tranter is a lawyer and human rights activist. You can follow her on Twitter @KellieTranter

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Kellie Tranter

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Kellie Tranter
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy