Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Racist population fears killed by facts

By Malcolm King - posted Friday, 25 January 2013

This article destroys the claim by the anti-population (anti-pops) lobby comprising the Stable Population Party and their rivals, Stop Population Growth Now Party (SPNG), that migration is destroying the Australians way of life through consumption.

In my article Eco-Fascist face of population control I dismissed the anti-pops food shortage fear campaign in Australia, by producing comprehensive data from ABARE and other government sources, on the sheer volume of food Australian farmers and graziers produce every year.

If, in a moment of madness, we decided to drive our exports on to the domestic market, every man, woman and child would be required to eat about $500,000 of meat, grain and vegetables per year, every year.


I exposed their meta-ideology of rolling psychology, sociology, biology, climate analysis, Marxist economics and half-baked mathematics, into an embarrassing roulade of nonsense. The anti-pops thinking has much in common with the conspiratorial and delusional beliefs of the Heaven’s Gate cult in America before their mass suicide.

The anti-pops have been relentless campaigners against migrants and Australia’s humanitarian aid programs. Let’s turn our attention to disaggregating migrant numbers in our population and their transitory nature.

First of all we need to understand the difference between people who come to Australia on Temporary visas and those who come on Permanent visas. I have chosen 2009-10 as it was around the mean of migrants to enter Australia on both visa types.

Keep this ABS definition of Number of Migrants (NOM) in mind.

“NOM is the addition (or loss) to the resident population arising from the difference between those leaving Australia and those arriving, either permanently or on a long-term basis (in the county 12 months or more over a 16 month period). This includes long-term temporary entrants such as overseas students, New Zealand citizens, and Australian permanent residents or citizens returning home.” (Italics are mine).

Components of NOM


Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics and Department of Immigration and Citizenship.

The NOM is fluid. Waves of people come in and waves of people leave. It is not simply an endless addition of wave upon wave of people.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

73 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Malcolm King is a journalist and professional writer. He was an associate director at DEEWR Labour Market Strategy in Canberra and the senior communications strategist at Carnegie Mellon University in Adelaide. He runs a writing business called Republic.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Malcolm King

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 73 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy