Marxist-feminist fifth column infiltrates James Bond

Then, when he meets Sévérine in the casino later on, he interacts with her in the most creepy, unnatural and unnerving way. "You were a child prostitute, I can tell", sheesh Bond - way to charm the ladies!   Shortly after, he just creeps naked into her shower without saying a word.

Then he promptly lets her die! A metaphor I suppose for his powerlessness and impotence with women (although as soon as she's dead, oh NOW he's somehow able to kill all the henchmen and capture the villain...)

I wondered why the script-writers didn't show Bond actually creating attraction, being cocky and witty and charming, developing a sexual rapport with the opposite character.

But then I researched it, and I discovered that John Logan, the main script writer for Skyfall, is openly gay. One may thus speculate that he doesn't know the first thing about male-female sexual dynamics, and that deficiency of knowledge is apparent in his work on this Bond film. So instead, the only sexual dynamic in the film is between two men, Bond and the villain.

Honestly, when Bond said something like "How do you know it's not my first time?" in response to Silva stroking him, I felt my skin crawl. It was really uncomfortable for me. Because you know, I've seen every Bond film, and I KNOW what Bond is like. It was a disturbing scene.

Look, there is a reason why all this matters, there is a serious reason why these corruptions of our hero must be opposed. When Fleming created the character, he said his books were for "warm-blooded heterosexuals", and for 50 years, James Bond has been the leading archetype of warm-blooded, white, Anglo-Saxon male heterosexuals, and James Bond films have been glorifications of that archetype.

Human beings need archetypes they can identify with: it is a deep-seated psychological need. But the condition of being white and male and straight has come to be seen by the bien pensant leftist cultural elite as the enemy, as something to be torn down and trampled. It is the patriarchy! It is the oppressor! It must not be glorified; it must be belittled, diminished and destroyed!

But what happens when you take away a group of people's identifying archetype, and marginalise and alienate them, is they go crazy! They retreat into an introspective world of confusion and psychosis. This is the direct cause of the spate of mass shootings: intelligent young white heterosexual males who have been alienated by society and deprived of their identity.

Society doesn't realise what they're doing to this cohort of people. They are driving erstwhile capable and contributive members of society into a darkly introverted psychosis, in which space, inevitably, some of them snap and "go postal", as it seems to them to be the only possible release for the pent up and constrained emotions they are consumed by.

Yet if they just had an archetype they could identify with as a hero, who could exemplify the distinction between good and evil, whilst simultaneously giving expression to all the passions that come naturally to white male heterosexuals, such horrific senseless violence in our schools and public places could be avoided.

That heroic archetype is James Bond, and that is why he MUST be restored to culture in his original, intended incarnation. We must fight the good fight and not give in to the forces of Marxist-feminism, for they know not what evil they create.