Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Waiting for salvation

By Bruce Haigh - posted Monday, 17 December 2012

Spare a thought for the Salvation Army and other non government organizations in the run up to Xmas as they try and raise funds to give the least advantaged in our community something to ease the pain, bring some joy or just provide the basics over the 'festive season'. It is difficult getting people to put their hands in their pockets at the best of times but this year the economic pinch is being felt far more widely than it was last year.

The Salvos have come to epitomise organisational generosity at the grass roots. They mix it in pubs looking for the spare dollar to spend on the broken lives and desperate people. I remember with great affection and respect their presence amongst the troops when needed. They have a special if not iconic place within Australia.

Therefore it is difficult to understand why, through their presence, they have chosen to provide legitimacy to the running of the government's, chose your name - transit camp, detention facility, prison or concentration camp.


The welfare of detainees in detention facilities has been the concern of various refugee and human rights groups and individuals. The Salvation Army has not been noted for its involvement, and yet on 10 September 2012, the Minister for Immigration, Chris Bowen, announced that the Salvation Army would provide support services for asylum seekers on Nauru and Manus Island, including case management, community liaison programs and activities. The West Australian newspaper said, on 14 November, that the Salvation Army would receive $22 million for its work on Nauru, presumably covering a twelve month period.

On the 30 October the Salvation Army defended conditions for asylum seekers on Nauru and, stung by continuing criticism of its role on the island, issued a news and media release, on 6 November, in which it answered questions it alleged had been directed at the organization. In the preamble to these questions, Major Moulds, Territorial Director Social Mission and Resources, said, "We have not yet been able to deliver everything we had planned, but we are working towards offering a wide range of educational and recreational opportunities. We are advocating for better facilities and we have seen the plans developed for them. We agree this is not an ideal situation, but every day we are with the people, doing what we can to make things more bearable."

He denied that the Salvation Army was monitoring and denying internet access to some detainees. This issue was raised again on 6 December by the Refugee Action Collective. The charge is denied but even if the Salvation Army is acting only in a manner designed to ensure equity of use for all, it has set itself up as the gate keeper and in a venue which generates considerable tension it must expect that management of any resource, but particularly one of such sensitivity, can only be expected to bring the opprobrium of inmates upon it.

Finally Major Moulds says, "…there are people who are seeking to attack the policy of the government by attacking The Salvation Army for its involvement in caring for asylum seekers transferred to offshore processing centre's. They see this as a way to further their agenda against the government policy of offshore processing, and the truth is of little consequence to them." Besides having the ring of George Pell's rhetoric in defending the Catholic Church, Major Moulds misses the point. Like it or not, whether they are aware of it or not, the presence of The Salvation Army working along-side government in the indefinite detention of asylum seekers lends the government's policies legitimacy. So in attacking the presence of the Salvation Army and its role on Nauru critics are attacking both the government and the Salvation Army for lack of judgment.

Institutions which sought to nurture and succor children of The Stolen Generation, nonetheless became tainted with the evilness of the policy and were caught, to greater or lesser extent, in the allegations and substance of the abuses which occurred. The same is equally true of the institutions associated with Child Migrants from Malta and England at the end of WWII.

Following one of the rare outside visits to Nauru, the head of Amnesty International in Australia, Graham Thom said on 21 November that he had grave concerns for the mental health of the 387 asylum seekers on the island.


The Salvation Army is a member of the Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS) which together with 260 other organizations paid for an advertisement in The Australian newspaper on 8 September, 2011, calling on the government to undertake onshore processing of asylum seekers. On 22 November ACOSS said Australia's treatment of asylum seekers had reached a new low with the decision to ban asylum seekers found to be refugees from access to support services and the right to work.

On 14 December, following a visit to Nauru, the United Nations High Commission for Refugees strongly condemned the detention facilities for asylum seekers on Nauru and the absence of due process in dealing with claims for asylum.

Why hasn't the Salvation Army born similar witness to the conditions on Nauru which it is intimately aware of? It most certainly did not remain mute about what it witnessed in WWI, WWII, Korea and Vietnam. Why, on this issue, does the Salvation Army appear to have lost its moral compass?

A Salvation Army publication, "Refugees and Asylum Seekers: What you need to know", says in part, "Issues of border security and eradication of people smuggling are important, but need to be separated from the fair and compassionate treatment of asylum seekers…The current practice of detaining asylum seekers who arrive by boat on excised territory severely restricts their access to basic rights and services, including legal representation, education, translators, and advocacy and health services. This approach impacts on the mental, physical and emotional health of asylum seekers and lacks compassion and dignity."As if to underline the level of their denial, The Salvation Army, has advertised this month for a gym worker to provide fitness services to asylum seekers on Nauru.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

11 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Bruce Haigh is a political commentator and retired diplomat who served in Pakistan and Afghanistan in 1972-73 and 1986-88, and in South Africa from 1976-1979

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Bruce Haigh

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Bruce Haigh
Article Tools
Comment 11 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy