Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Free-to-air's future

By Ian Nance - posted Thursday, 13 December 2012


Sir Frank tended to example the top-down approach taken by all media in those days – Channel Nine audiences were shown what expert programmers, such as himself ("I'm an average viewer!), Bruce Gyngell, and Ron Haynes, decided would interest them.

Ratings proved their judgements to be very right, particularly as they tended to use U.S ratings guidelines to set programme placements here, but audiences had no option but to accept what was offered without being able to influence its screening in the short term.

It's a vastly different situation these days. Pay television, direct satellite international feeds, the internet's vast number of specialised web sites, and time-shift recording makes it possible for the viewer to be the programmer.

Advertisement

This is one reason why I do not see any great expansion in the place or role of free-to-air TV, much less a possible fourth commercial channel in cities, because nowadays, that is available already to those prepared to search for items of interest.

Like listening to radio, much of free TV's programming is decided for the audience, not by them. This can provide the benefits of having others select the material, rather than the need to make one's own choices all the time.

It means that a person does not need a large library of material, or need to spend a large amount of time researching viewing sources, which often depends on what the person is seeking – entertainment, education, visual wallpaper, or whatever. If they do not enjoy being at the whim of what a channel offers, they may change easily.

Another factor of free TV is its screening of advertising. This topic is open to huge debate about the question of advertising's desirability, but one fact is hard and proven – shows which attract viewers attract advertisers, and this lies at the heart of broadcasting's economics.

Revenue depends on viewer numbers (ratings) thus profitability depends on audience acceptance and loyalty, which is sometimes driven by topic relevance such as sport, car racing etc., the quality of production, its programming frequency; generally all these have strong entertainment factors, often aimed at mass markets, not smaller more discerning audiences, as a benefit to advertisers.

TV production is expensive by nature – there are really no cheap ways of creating good quality interesting programming, whether live or recorded, produced in house, or purchased from outside suppliers.

Advertisement

Yet money spent effectively in this area can see an enormous long-term cash return to the station. The trick is to know how much, and where to spend.

News is a classic example of expensive live production. It often hallmarks a station's image, credibility, viewability and, hence, advertising saleability. But we also have the converse of this in Australia – our ABC.

The ABC is exceptional; its programming tends to be more informative as well as entertaining.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ian Nance's media career began in radio drama production and news. He took up TV direction of news/current affairs, thence freelance television and film producing, directing and writing. He operated a program and commercial production company, later moving into advertising and marketing.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Ian Nance

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Ian Nance
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy