Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Don't skyjack the taxpayer

By Jonathan J. Ariel - posted Tuesday, 20 November 2012


6. Still on PPPs, it's worth remembering that to date they have not been success stories. Sydney's Cross City Tunnel and the Lane Cove Tunnel both careened into receivership. And on Saturday, The Australian reported the sad state of PPPs in the Sunshine State where five road tunnels were promised to be built under the Brisbane River, and only two have been completed (distressingly one is in receivership and the other is close to it), work on yet another tunnel has commenced and the plans for two other tunnels have been sent to the archives.

7. What exactly went wrong with those PPPs? And can it be made right? Is there a problem in the design of PPP tenders? In the intention of the contracts? In the supervision of the contractual obligations? Many taxpayers see PPPs as little more than selling public assets to companies, who generate excess profits, lack transparency, diminished environmental protections or a decrease in jobs.

8. Have the lessons of privatizing Sydney's KSA – from a taxpayer's or consumer's point of view - been learned?

Advertisement

NSW may really need a second airport, and then again maybe it doesn't.

How about all those who will derive direct measurable benefits from such a facility, pledge to pony up the cash to bankroll it? Once they do, let the public debate begin.

Until then, I am confident that NSW Premier Barry O'Farrell's horse is the one to back. No matter how short the odds.

The last thing he needs is to support a project, which could easily prove to be a financial and a political nightmare.

Why would he wish to help manufacture a problem with so little upside on his watch and one which could very easily see him shoehorned out of his job in favour of the ambitious Treasurer, Mike Baird or the ever diligent, no nonsense Transport Minister, Gladys Berejiklian.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

1 post so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Jonathan J. Ariel is an economist and financial analyst. He holds a MBA from the Australian Graduate School of Management. He can be contacted at jonathan@chinamail.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Jonathan J. Ariel

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Jonathan J. Ariel
Article Tools
Comment 1 comment
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy