Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Radiation: no safe levels

By Noel Wauchope - posted Wednesday, 24 October 2012


Studies on small animal life in Chernobyl and Fukushima have indicated genetic damage due to radiation. More recently reports have described birth defects linked to radiation-affected areas such as Fallujah in Iraq. But, as the nuclear lobby reminds us, a link is not proof. Even with reports emerging, the World Health Organisation (WHO) remains silent. Since 1959, an agreement signed between WHO and the International Atomic Energy Agency, and then a number of additional legal texts, prohibits the WHO from intervening in research into health effects of nuclear accidents.

If scientists studied consequences rather than causes, then high-rates of birth abnormalities may provide the proof required by the WHO to investigate. This is the approach adopted by the International Birth Defects Prevention Program in July 2012. Measuring radiation alone is difficult and can produce ambiguous results. But measuring babies born with malformations is more concrete. Facts are facts here. As Dr Vladimir Wertelecki says “ a baby that has no head is a baby that has no head.”

The initial program started in 2000, conducting a ten-year study on five provinces in the Ukraine, measuring and monitoring all newborn babies. The study, led by Dr. Wladimir Wertelecki of the University of Southern Alabama in Mobilewas done in co-operation with Ukraine health authorities. It was a descriptive epidemiological study. It could prove only a difference between geographical areas. It could not prove the cause of difference.

Advertisement

Within 2-3 years it was obvious that the rates of spina bifida and other defects of the nervous system, were many times greater than expected, particularly in one province. A few years later an excess of conjoined twins was found. They found other nervous system problems, mainly microcephaly - a neurodevelopmental disorder in which the circumference of the head is more than two standard deviations smaller than average for the person's age and sex.After 10 years of study they published a report showing an excess of frequency of anomalies of nervous system and of conjoined twins.

This was found especially in the northern half of the province – an area that is a unique ecology niche – mainly wetlands. And this area also has a unique population, an ethnic group living there since recorded history. They live in small villages, very isolated, and they rely completely on local foods.These foods are all radioactive. The soil there is such that plants absorb many times more radioactivity. People there are absorbing much higher levels of radiation, 20 times more than there would be in soil 50 kilometers away.

One of the main causes of birth abnormalities is foetal alcohol syndrome (FAS). FAS is a pattern of mental and physical defects that can develop in a fetus in association with high levels of alcohol consumption during pregnancy. However, Dr. Wertelecki and the six universities that joined the well-funded and extensive study found that in the Northern area of Ukraine alcohol use among pregnant women is statistically less than in the Ukraine in general. Alcohol therefore did not explain the birth abnormalities. Radiation is the obvious major cause.

Abnormalities in the developing foetus-teratogenesis

Little research has been done on the causes of foetus-teratogenesis in humans. Studies on non-human species show that foetus in first three months are about 1000 times more vulnerable to environmental effects.

Dr. Wertelecki’s team focused on teratogenesis and changes caused by environmental interference to a developing foetus with normal genes. This is distinguished from gene mutations, inherited from parents. The two processes have different effects. The genetic, inherited defects are most likely to cause mental disability. But with the teratogenic abnormalities, the baby, if it survives, most often is of normal intelligence.

Advertisement

The teratogenesisprocess can begin very early, before the ovum has been implanted in the wall of the womb. If the line in the embryo is split it results in twins. If the split is incomplete it results in conjoined twins or Siamese twins. A fetiform teratoma is a failed Siamese twin.

Abnormalities that are started at a little later stage of pregnancy include spina bifida, (an opening in the lower back body wall), opening in front body wall with the heart on the exterior, and anencephaly (sometimes an absence of a head or of most of the skull and brain). Other effects are anophthalmia (missing eyeballs) or microphthalmia (tiny eyes).

Exposure to radiation has three types of effects: acute or immediate effects such as burns and radiation sickness; teratogenesis which impacts rapidly developing tissue as an external interference factor; and delayed cancers and genetic changes. Genetic changes have long-range effects, both before birth and even into the next generation. Chromosomes are affected in both egg and sperm, resulting in a hereditary chromosome problem.  

Genetic effects of Chernobyl radiation: Genomic instability?

This Ukraine province study concentrated on the second effect – teratogenesis. However, remember that in this area, there is a unique population. This isolated ethnic group stays within one area. So, here we have a third generation exposed to radiation since before their conception. This is because for some young women, say 16 years old in 1986, even if they were not pregnant, their oocytes absorbed radiation. 

Later, in pregnancy, their foetus would be exposed to that radiation. Those babies, now teenagers, will in turn, have their babies exposed to radiation-affected chromosomes.

So here, this particular population is indeed a test case for that third, delayed, effect. This brings in the question of gene mutations and chromosomes – the unpredictable subject of genomic instability. It is not surprising that politicians, and people in general, do not understand genomic instability. Scientists do not understand it, or what it means for future populations.

The consequences of genomic instability have not been studied in humans. We know that abnormal genes cause abnormal cells, abnormal tissues, and hence, abnormal organisms, resulting in advanced aging processes and cancer. Genomic instability in a population will produce changes, some perceptible, some not. It will cause infertility and changes in the rates of degenerative diseases.  It is hard to study genomic instability in humans, for example, how do you study a fertilised egg that never gets implanted?

Still, research into this is now an emerging science being studied with human cells in-vitro.Genomic instability is also now studied in a variety of non-human organisms. There are research results on butterflies and birds. Danish ornithologists found very serious instability in Chernobyl - the same results that are now being found in Fukushima. Results include weakened birds unable to migrate, microcephaly, crooked wings, abnormal tail feathers, and many male barn swallows are sterile.

The Ukraine research team chose strontium as the radioactive isotope to study. Radiation dosimetry is complex because different radioisotopes affect different parts of the body. Official measurements are usually done on caesium – probably because it is the easiest and least expensive to measure. Strontium measuring is much more specialised and expensive. Strontium is absorbed like calcium. Teeth and bones bind calcium. Strontium is measured by U.S. consistently and was measured after every atomic bomb test. The Ukraine study found that strontium was pervasive in the area.

What is the message from research in the Chernobyl affected population?

The message is that science and medicine must turn their attention to young women, pregnant women, and children. There really can be no doubt about this. It is quite scandalous that official studies, both after Chernobyl and Fukushima, continue to ignore children. The only emphasis on children is in measuring thyroid abnormalities, and the epidemic of thyroid cancer in Ukraine children. Apart from that, all the attention is on cancer, and adults. There is no registry of pregnant women. There is no monitoring of birth abnormalities.Even radiation “acceptable” standards are set for adult males, not for women and children.

The absolute priority should be women of reproductive age and children and whatever affects them will affect the most important principles of preventive health. There should be monitoring of congenital malformations. Ionising radiation is a most likely cause, though there are other causes as well. Ionising radiation is prevalent in areas other than Chernobyl and Fukushima, coming from coal burning plants and from dumping waste. Because there is no monitoring of congenital malformations, we have no baseline.

There is now hope that official research priorities will change. There is a continually growing movement to free up the World Health Organisation from its present inability to do medical research in Chernobyl and Fukushima. From 1959 until now, the World Health Organisation has been hamstrung by its agreement with the IAEA. On May 12, 2011 history was quietly made when the new WHO Director-General Margaret Chan said “There is no safe low level of radiation."

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

13 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Noel Wauchope taught science before switching to nursing. She has several post-graduate qualifications, in health informatics, medical terminology and clinical coding. She is a long time anti-nuclear activist.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Noel Wauchope

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 13 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy