Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

How marriage equality was defeated in Tasmania

By Rodney Croome - posted Wednesday, 3 October 2012


He again opened his mind to the Bill when it was pointed out that not a single same-sex couple shared his views because what we want is the option to marry.

But then MLCs were hit with a last minute fear and misinformation campaign from opponents of reform.

With less than 24 hours before the debate was due to begin, MLCs were avalanched with legal opinions that exaggerated the constitutional risks associated with passing the legislation.

Advertisement

One was from Neville Rochow SC, the Australian Family Association’s go-to guy on the constitutionality of marriage equality law.

Rochow produced a table showing the state would face a bill of up to $1.25 million if its same-sex marriage law was struck down in the High Court.

This fellow had already proven his advice is unreliable.

He had previously advised MLCs that state same-sex marriage laws are unconstitutional because the matter is one for the Commonwealth.

But in May he gave contradictory evidence to a Senate inquiry when he said the Commonwealth can’t act on same-sex marriage, so only state laws are constitutional.

http://tasmaniantimes.com/index.php/article/rodney2

Advertisement

Prof George Williams, who wrote the textbook on the Australian Constitution and who had already briefed MLCs on the constitutional validity of state same-sex marriage laws, pointed out the glaring mistakes in Rochow’s advice.

Together with the Tasmanian Solicitor-General he made clear a High Court loss, should it ever occur, would cost far, far less.

But on top of Rochow came a letter from former state governor and chief justice William Cox which asserted without any legal reasoning that “the present Bill is clearly inconsistent with the Federal Marriage Act”.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

11 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Rodney Croome is a spokesperson for Equality Tasmania and national advocacy group, just.equal. He who was made a Member of the Order of Australia in 2003 for his LGBTI advocacy.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Rodney Croome

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 11 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy