Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

NSW local government elections: has western Sydney turned right?

By Fred Fuentes - posted Wednesday, 19 September 2012

Pointing to swings of 10-20 per cent in parts of Western Sydney to Liberal candidates standing in the September 8 local council elections, media commentators are claiming traditional working class areas have deserted Labor and rejected the Greens, instead choosing to shift rightwards.

The Sydney Morning Heraldheadlined its September 10 edition: "Change in the air as Libs take over Labor strongholds." The previous day's Sunday Telegraph argued "Urban voters dump Greens." Seemingly drawing a similar conclusion, Greens NSW MP David Shoebridge said on September 9 "the electorate's mood was clearly conservative".

Such views fail to take into consideration the deeper trends underway in these working class and largely migrant areas. Rather, these claims are part of a campaign to further push politics to the right, and lay the basis of a new wave of attacks by the Liberal state government.


Liberals consolidate anti-Labor vote

There is no doubt the Liberals made important gains in Western Sydney, symbolised by the big victory for their mayor candidate in Liverpool, a traditional Labor area.

With a swing of 23.6 per cent, the Liberal candidate for Liverpool Mayor more than doubled the party's 2008 local council election result to 38,292 votes. But to argue that the rise in votes was due to a desertion of Labor voters has little basis in facts.

For one, the swing against Labor was much smaller (5.2 per cent) which in real terms meant it lost less than 2,000 votes. Clearly most of the new Liberal votes in Liverpool did not come from Labor. Instead, the votes mostly came from those who had previously voted for independent candidates.

The combined vote for the five independent candidates who stood in the 2008 mayoral elections surpassed Labor's vote, but this year the vote for independent mayoral candidates fell by more than 16,000.

A similar pattern was repeated elsewhere in Western Sydney.


The starkest example is Auburn, which despite the huge overall swing to the Liberals in the last state election, remained one of the safest state Labor seats. There, the Liberals council election vote more than doubled, from 3,734 votes to 7,709, in the process overtaking the Labor vote. But Labor's vote actually slightly increased from 6,827 to 6,993.

The rise in votes for the Liberals is largely explained by the implosion of Unity's vote, which fell by more than 3400.

The main factor behind the rise in the Liberal vote was its ability to consolidate the existing anti-Labor vote that was previously dispersed among other independents or centre/centre-right groups.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All

This article was originally published at Green Left Weekly on 15 September 2012.

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Fred Fuentes is a member of the Socialist Alliance and an author for Green Left Weekly.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Fred Fuentes

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy