Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

You can't give a Gonski if you don't get Gonski

By Chris Bonnor - posted Wednesday, 5 September 2012


No, they have to come up with a different narrative and policy. Christopher Pyne has given it a shot, and some of what he has been talking about is important, much of it coming from the Grattan Institute's Ben Jensen. He has focused on teacher quality, training and ongoing professional development, drawing on the (often misreported) example of Shanghai. And yes, teachers do need recognition for their work and do need to be treated as a profession. He has also questioned the focus on class sizes, although he needs to explain what is coming across as a commitment to increase them. Try telling that to teachers in disadvantaged schools and in early childhood where small classes are important.

Like most politicians he pitches his suggestions on the assumption that his ideas are new and can't be found in any existing school or system. Who can forget how Bob Carr single-handedly invented homework in the mid 1990s and Kevin Rudd must surely be the father of computers. But his narrative really comes apart on many important issues. In July he dismissed the idea of higher salaries for teachers although he recently changed his tune on that score. Perhaps he discovered that higher teacher salaries really are associated with high school system performance.

His pitch on equity is alarmingly wrong, claiming that "there isn't actually an issue in Australian schools that revolves around equity". He comes to this stunning conclusion by excluding the impact of school socio-educational status. Differences in school SES are created by the school choices of those with money to pay fees - and he certainly won't go find a problem in that. Sure, there are the residualised schools they leave behind, the argument goes - but it is their job to lift their remaining kids and their fault if they don't. Pyne and Gillard are driven by the same script. Says Christopher Pyne: "it's not about equity, it's about the outcomes of our poor students who aren't being given the right education in the first place."

Advertisement

After all, his narrative continues, "the greatest determinants of the outcome of students is the parental involvement in their children's lives at school". In this way he tries to skew the whole family/school equity issue to one of parental involvement which is, would you believe, more commonly found in autonomous schools. Hence, in his view of the world "it's about principal autonomy, it's about the independence that teachers have to teach, it's about governing council control of schools." He scores one of those three correct. As a consequence of all this "that's why in the non-government school systems students tend to perform better".

If Christopher Pyne has read the Gonski review and its contributing research then his statements are deliberately misleading. But it is kinder and probably more accurate to assume that he has not done his homework. Why should he? The education policy trail shows that statements of belief are far more powerful than statements of evidence for politicians of all colour. It is also far easier to find out about Gonski through the eyes of his preferred school system allies, keen to white-ant the findings, the recommendations and soon, the legislation.

In his comments about justice and each school sector's funding share he not only showed ignorance of Gonski but of the very nature of public and private education. School systems don't get a share of funding in proportion to their enrolment and never will. We don't have two comparable and competing systems with equal calls on funding. It is not some neo-liberal's fantasy. What we have is a public system with schools which must be available for all kids – and various private schools which might be available to some if they can jump through the hoops, especially represented by fees. The public funding needs of these two groups of schools are very different.

The shame of the Opposition's antics is that they have the potential to bury the whole school funding problem. What was a school sector-neutral report and the beginnings of a sector-neutral debate and search for sector-neutral solutions is now degenerating into more of the unproductive debate that we have had for decades. The risk that the Opposition faces is that attempts to undermine this important reform process is that there is now a critical mass of opinion and awareness about the issue that might pass harsh judgment on any political party that refuses to face up to the need for change.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Chris Bonnor is a former principal and is a Fellow of the Centre for Policy Development. His next book with Jane Caro, What makes a good school, will be published in July. He also manages a media monitoring website on education issues www.futuredforum.blogspot.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Chris Bonnor

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Chris Bonnor
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy