Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Peter Garrett: encouraging signs (a Kiwi perspective)

By Kelvin Smythe - posted Monday, 27 August 2012


To be honest, at first reading, encouraging signs in the auditor-general's report seem to be few and far between. Indeed, to be even more honest seem to be none and none between.

'Yet to make a statistically significant improvement' has a certain definitive and end-of-argument ring to it.

But perhaps, I'm relying too much on statistics and not seeing it as just a matter of language.

Advertisement

Perhaps, it is just a matter of language.

After all, why should we choose the auditor-general's language over Pete's; after all did the auditor-general ever have an Australian No.1 or even more significantly a New Zealand No. 1?

Why should we go with the auditor-general's no 'statistically significant improvement' as an expression of where NAPLAN is over Pete's assurance that overall results 'remained steady'?

What Pete is really saying is that we're looking in the wrong place for signs of improvement: instead of looking for signs of improvement in improvement we should be looking for signs of improvement in avoiding going backwards. In that sense, 'staying steady' or, if you insist, no 'statistically significant improvement', is an encouraging sign of the most encouraging sort.

Finale

Peter Garrett you have done badly. You listened to the wrong voices, as so many politicians have done before, because those voices are the beguiling ones suggesting power and aggrandisement.

Advertisement

The way to help Australian children is to empower schools and classroom teachers, not self-serving academics and bureaucrats. I suppose they pulled the evidence-based trick on you did they?

To help Australian children go Australian, not American corporate.

As a Labour politician and an idealistic songwriter why didn't you go to the people, the teachers, the people who work with teachers?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. 6
  8. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Kelvin Smythe was a New Zealand primary school teacher, principal, university lecturer, and senior inspector of schools.
He has written various publications and articles on social studies promoting the idea of the ‘feeling for’ approach to social studies.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy