Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Iran bomb fever ratchets up in Israel

By Graham Cooke - posted Wednesday, 15 August 2012


Waltz contends the religious hierarchy with the final say are rational thinkers who would quite understand that one bomb on Israel, which incidentally would kill thousands of Palestinians as well as Israelis, would result in a massive retaliation, turning their country into a radioactive graveyard.

He also rejects the widely-held belief that an Iranian bomb could be passed to a convenient terrorist organisation, such as Hizbollah, to do the dirty work.

"It would be easy to discover Iranian responsibility, and countries that develop nuclear weapons retain tight control over their arsenals. After all, building a bomb is costly and dangerous and it would make little sense to transfer the product of that investment to parties that cannot be trusted or managed," he writes.

Advertisement

Even so, just one Iranian bomb is something Israel will not tolerate and the leadership in Tehran knows this. The game going on in the Middle East may simply be another in the ancient tradition of bluff and counter bluff and that in the end Iran may actually want to do what it says it has been doing all along – develop a peaceful nuclear energy program so that it can sell more of its oil overseas and ultimately, replace oil for its energy needs when that finite resource has had its day.

Working out how that can be proved, while keeping the worried attack dog Benjamin Netanyahu on a leash, will be a priority for the next American Administration, whatever its political make-up.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

19 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Cooke has been a journalist for more than four decades, having lived in England, Northern Ireland, New Zealand and Australia, for a lengthy period covering the diplomatic round for The Canberra Times.


He has travelled to and reported on events in more than 20 countries, including an extended stay in the Middle East. Based in Canberra, where he obtains casual employment as a speech writer in the Australian Public Service, he continues to find occasional assignments overseas, supporting the coverage of international news organisations.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Cooke

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Graham Cooke
Article Tools
Comment 19 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy