Australia and other foreign Governments and aid donors have been pouring millions of dollars into Susiya - despite its long running legal battles and the continuing uncertainty of tenure for its inhabitants - as Senator Lee Rhiannon disclosed to the Australian Senate:
Right now many projects financed by overseas aid programs in Susiya in the West Bank are under threat from demolition orders issued by the Israeli civil administration. This includes an AusAID funded health clinic constructed through ActionAid's local partners. Other projects at risk include a dairy production facility supported by the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs; the construction of four residential shelters funded with assistance from GVC, an Italian NGO; three animal shelters built in partnership with Save the Children UK and the Union of Agricultural Work Committees; and two water cisterns funded by the European Commission Humanitarian Aid Organisation and Action Against Hunger. Other aid projects which could be demolished include a community centre and a structure used to store sheep's milk prior to sale, as well as granaries and shelters for sheep and chickens.
Why would Australia risk spending money in an area where it could possibly see the small population living there being declared as squatters and ordered by the Courts to move? Why commit aid funds to projects in Area C where no building approvals have been granted?
Advertisement
Would this money not be better employed in projects throughout the remaining 40% of the West Bank where 95% of the Arab population live under the administrative control of the Palestinian Authority or even in Area C where master plans for Arab villages have been approved by Israel?
The answer can be found in the following statement by the Rabbis For Human Rights:
At first blush, it may seem that this is “only” about the threat to demolish the entire village of Susya, the homes of these simple cave dwellers of the South Hebron Hills. However, the truth is that the results will affect the fate of hundreds of Palestinian homes throughout the Occupied Territories, perhaps thousands. The outcome may well have an effect on our major appeal to return planning authority for Palestinian communities in Area C to Palestinian hands.
The erection of illegal Arab structures has gathered pace in Area C as the Palestinian Authority pursues a policy of encouraging illegal land grabs, settlement and building on state lands in Area C.
Such land theft has consequences - and the Courts are increasingly being approached to have such activity declared illegal.
Illegal settlement - by either Arabs or Jews - should be regarded with equal severity.
Advertisement
Such conduct can be sought to be justified in the court of public opinion by organized demonstrations in front of demolished shelters using disputed facts - all dutifully recorded on television news and in sensational headlines around the world - or resolved by the Israeli courts.
Access to the Israeli Court system by Arab residents of the West Bank has always been available using the services of well funded and well resourced organizations such as Rabbis For Human Rights - whose donors include:.
- Caritas Belgium
- Church of Scotland
- Church of Sweden
- European Commission
- Evangelical Church– Starkenburg West
- Ford Foundation
- New Israel Fund
- Norwegian Church
- Swedish Church
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.
18 posts so far.