Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Why the U.S. will never recapture its greatness

By Mark Christensen - posted Friday, 8 June 2012


Friedman contends U.S. administrations have played a vital role in generating growth by maintaining the rule of law, promulgating regulations that incentivise risk-taking and prevent recklessness, educating the work force, building infrastructure and funding scientific research. This is, at best, only partly correct. In a realistic sense, it is only individuals who act and make decisions, who adhere to the law, take risks and learn better ways.

The American people, though beguiled by the vain promises of democracy, have not forsaken their political culture. Rather, vetocracy is a backlash directed at condescending elites for their continued misreading of their national narrative. The Tea Party’s apocalyptic ‘Down With Everything’ is a desperate and crude but legitimate polemic designed to elevate historical qualms and move beyond nostalgic non-remedies, like fiddling with institutional rules, to the all-or-nothingness that defines life, liberty and happiness. Combative conservatives seek to destroy government because the political establishment cannot inspire the country to transcend it.

If Jefferson’s “vessel in which we are all embarked amidst the conflicting elements of a troubled world” is to achieve its aim, those at the helm must confront, unapologetically, the duplicitous and sentimental rendering of the relationship between power, freedom and responsibility. However seemingly empowered and well-intentioned, politicians cannot take responsibility for individuals taking personal responsibility for their choices. The trade-off between radical liberalism and the public interest is, in the end, of no lasting salience, since social order, economic prosperity and the like all ultimately derive from the moral self.

Advertisement

Is not this shocking political reality the true test of American renown?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Article edited by Jo Coghlan.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

9 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mark is a social and political commentator, with a background in economics. He also has an abiding interest in philosophy and theology, and is trying to write a book on the nature of reality. He blogs here.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mark Christensen

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 9 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy