The burden of proof

“Sure, Dave. Go look up smallpox.”

Could you please provide scientific evidence which can prove that disease reduction in any part of the world, at any point in history was attributable to inoculation of populations?

“Yes, Dave. Smallpox, again, as well as Polio. Go look them up, the evidence won’t be hard to find. It would be easier to ignore, I imagine.”

Could you please explain how the safety and mechanism of vaccines in the human body are scientifically proven if their pharmacokinetics (the study of bodily absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of ingredients) are never examined or analysed in any vaccine study?

“Your question implies that if the vaccine ingredients aren’t examined during vaccine trials, they aren’t examined at all. These examinations aren’t required during vaccine trials, because they’ve already been done in other trials. The vaccine trials are to test the hypothesis that they will activate the human immune system against specific viral or bacterial infections, with all the ingredients acting together for a singular purpose. Safety is tested and must be confirmed prior to human trials, or human trials don’t even occur.”

Could you please provide scientific justification as to how injecting a human being with a confirmed neurotoxin is beneficial to human health and prevents disease?

“As you should well know, being a qualified ND, that high quantities of water can be quite toxic for the human body, as well, resulting in what is known as hypernatremia, and yet water is vital to our bodies. Sunlight, too, is vital for life to even exist, and yet too much of that can cause skin cancer. Considering we are exposed to many toxic substances on a daily basis from nature itself, with no say in the matter and no serious consequences, the justification is then in the dose, and the purpose of those ingredients. The evidence is in the millions that get vaccines every day, with no ill effects.”

Can you provide a risk/benefit profile on how the benefits of injecting a known neurotoxin exceeds its risks to human health for the intended goal of preventing disease?

“The benefits of vaccines demonstrably outweigh the risks. The risks of vaccines also demonstrably outweigh the risks of their counterpart diseases. The risk analysis of the specific ingredients are included in the risk analysis of the vaccine.”

Could you please provide scientific justification on how bypassing the respiratory tract (or mucous membrane) is advantageous and how directly injecting viruses into the bloodstream enhances immune functioning and prevents future infections?

“Vaccines don’t contain living, active viruses, and they aren’t injected into the bloodstream.”

Could you please provide scientific justification on how a vaccine would prevent viruses from mutating?