Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Hereļæ½s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

God is cool with gay marriage

By Alan Austin - posted Tuesday, 10 April 2012

The greatest revision of belief within the Judaeo-Christian faiths since the Reformation is underway. It is a bruising process with skirmishes erupting regularly around the globe. Conservatives are still winning, but progressives are gaining.

Six Roman Catholic bishops in Victoria wrote to their flock last week urging them to lobby politicians with their views on same-sex marriage. This is in response to proposed legislation in the federal Parliament to extend marriage to gay couples. “A grave mistake will be made if such legislation is enacted,” the bishops warned. On 2 April, 35 other faith leaders produced a contrasting letter urging Christians and Jews to support the marriage reforms. Signatories included respected Evangelical elder statesman Rowland Croucher from Melbourne, Jewish Rabbi Shoshana Kaminsky from Adelaide and prominent clergy from the Uniting, Anglican, Apostolic Johannite, Metropolitan and other churches across Australia. These letters are significant both for Australian politics and the future of the religious bodies.

The second, progressive letter effectively neutralises the impact of the first on any wavering MPs. Hence this lessens the pressure representatives have been under in the past to maintain the marriage status quo.


This pressure has been substantial in Australia and elsewhere. The five European nations (out of 38) that have legislated to ban same-sex unions: Lithuania, Moldova, Monaco, San Marino and Vatican City, are those most under Catholic or Orthodox influence.

For the churches and synagogues, the shift towards accepting gay couples into membership is of monumental importance. These religious bodies are effectively acknowledging they have been condemning people to hell for centuries, wrongly. For the conservatives resisting this reformation, the stakes are just as high: to change now is to cave in to the liberal secular lobby and abandon the true faith practised for 2000 years and longer for the Jewish community.

Four factors are impelling this shift towards accepting same-sex unions.

First, from science. Genetics, human physiology and psychiatry have shown that same-sex orientation is natural, healthy, not reversible, not contagious and poses no threat to anyone. From anthropology and sociology we know about four per cent of the population are homosexual and another four per cent bisexual. And has been so forever.

Paediatrics and behavioural sciences have shown same-sex parents are just as effective as hetrosexual parents in child-rearing outcomes. Zoology has confirmed that a small discrete percentage of same-sex couplings occurs in all gregarious bird and animal societies. So if gay sex did not originate in San Francisco in 1969, but is a normal part of God’s diverse creation, why does the Bible condemn homosexuality? Okay, dopey question for rationalists but a critical one for people of the Book.

Which brings us to the second significant recent shift: the biblical texts.

Jews and Christians believe God reveals his truth through both nature and Scripture. The two cannot be contradictory as God authored both. History has taught painfully that when they appear to conflict, science has been right and Scripture wrong. Or, more correctly, the traditional interpretation of Scripture has been wrong. Revolving earth or sun, schizophrenia versus demon possession, evolution versus creation in six days. All ferocious bouts between science and the Bible saw science won by knockouts.


Hence there is a willingness today to admit to error which has not always been apparent. Okay, some denominations are yet to abandon infallibility completely, but a shift is underway. Biblical historians now increasingly think that the Bible condemns homosexual rape, temple prostitution and coercive or abusive acts. But not loving, monogamous same-sex unions, as previously misinterpreted.

One-man-one-woman marriage is clearly not the only option in the Judeo-Christian texts.  Polygamy and concubinage are fine in certain situations. The intense love affair between David and Jonathan is nowhere condemned. Nor are any of the other biblical same-sex unions. The evidence of Scripture today, as with the natural law, suggests God is cool with variations.

The third area of discovery is in church history where heterosexual marriage has not been the only approved union. The very early church actually advocated celibacy and only reluctantly approved any partnership at all. Not until the 12th century did marriage become a sacrament. One-man-one-woman marriage as we know it today dates from the 16th century.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Article edited by Jo Coghlan.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

91 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Alan Austin is an Australian freelance journalist currently based in Nīmes in the South of France. His special interests are overseas development, Indigenous affairs and the interface between the religious communities and secular government. As a freelance writer, Alan has worked for many media outlets over the years and been published in most Australian newspapers. He worked for eight years with ABC Radio and Television’s religious broadcasts unit and seven years with World Vision. His most recent part-time appointment was with the Uniting Church magazine Crosslight.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Alan Austin

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Alan Austin
Article Tools
Comment 91 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy