Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Wind jobs falling into a federal black hole

By Ben Courtice - posted Thursday, 29 March 2012


After so much noise from the angry, anti-science, anti-wind farm campaigners that state Liberal governments are championing, you might blame layoffs at Victoria's biggest turbine construction company on the Baillieu government's 2011 anti-windfarm laws and their antipathy to strong climate action.

That company, Keppel Prince Engineering, is seeking volunteers for redundancies. General manager Steve Garner told the ABC, "All we're doing is pre-empting what we see as another black hole in our production coming after May of this year."

Baillieu's wind farm planning laws, and now the axeing of the more ambitious state greenhouse targets, do pose a grave threat to the future of renewable energy. The 2011 wind farm laws are costing our state more than $500 million in lost investment and close to 500 future jobs.

Advertisement

But jobs at Keppel Prince are being lost now. Why? In this case, it's due to Federal policy failings.

There is no lack of approved wind farm projects ready to build. Five wind farms have recently commenced construction works in Western Victoria – to avoid their planning permits expiring, and having to then re-apply under the 2011 state planning laws.

But while they are breaking the soil on the job, they are not necessarily placing the orders for the turbines yet. This would give Keppel Prince ongoing work, but serious financial backing is needed.

A key reason developers can't now get finance to begin construction is the low price of Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs). Wind farms sell these to energy retailers under the Federal government's Renewable Energy Target.

The REC price has been depressed since a Rudd government policy created a flood of "phantom RECs" into the market, allocating 5 RECs for every unit of rooftop solar installed. The price of RECs fell and has not recovered.

Subsequently, the Gillard government addressed the problem by creating a separate RET for large scale renewables. But energy retailers have stockpiled cheap RECs – enough to last to 2015 in some cases.

Advertisement

That means they will start looking for new wind farms in the next year or so. The big Silverton wind project near Broken Hill has been in the news for this reason. But that doesn't necessarily help the workers at Keppel Prince before May.

It doesn't have to be this way. There is a difference between the Liberals' anti-wind policy, apparently mired in extreme free-market and climate denial ideology, and that of the Federal ALP.

The Gillard government has publicly committed to action on climate change. If they want to get it right, they could easily remedy the problem.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

24 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ben Courtice is the renewable energy campaigner at Friends of the Earth Melbourne. He has participated in many environmental campaigns and social issues since growing up in Tasmania in the 1980s.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Ben Courtice
Article Tools
Comment 24 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy