His problem seems to be that from time to time he's confused as to whether he's leading Opus Dei or the Australian opposition.
It's possible to be an abortion sceptic, if you remember to couch that scepticism in line with the fact that half the people you want to vote for you are women whose views on pregnancy termination are rather more important than those of men. And that they are largely the opposite of yours.
It is permissible to be out of step with the global scientific community on global warming, but it's not wise to then let the view grow, among those whose urban votes you wish to attract, that therefore no one need worry overmuch about cleaning up the atmosphere.
Advertisement
It is conceivable that many Australians support the philosophic concept of cutting back on welfare. But that, in the smugly self-indulged society that is today's Australia, would be a very brave call indeed.
It is possible to believe that wages – real or relative – should be cut to fuel productivity improvements, but that may be rather more of a Luddite position than most 21st century Australian voters accept is feasible or proper.
Abbott is unchallenged. But he is not unchallengeable, especially if the polls start flowing Labor's way. That may be the ultimate result if Gillard now gets down to the real work.
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.
15 posts so far.