Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Acting on climate change is in Australia’s national interest

By Clancy Moore - posted Wednesday, 30 November 2011


Meanwhile, a small charge on global shipping emissions, supported by Germany, France and South Africa, is the other idea making waves on the journey to Durban. A report by the World Bank and the IMF proposes a charge of US$25 per ton of emissions. This could raise US$26 billion per year, of which US$13 billion could be used to tackle climate change. A charge on shipping emissions would also reduce emissions from the industry by 5-10 per cent per year.

Another important step is keeping the Kyoto Protocol alive. As the only legally binding agreement that commits rich countries to reduce emissions, Kyoto is the bedrock of international efforts to tackle climate change. Australia needs to support an extension of Kyoto as a stepping-stone towards a fair, ambitious and binding global climate agreement.

Any agreement must ensure poor countries avoid the worst impacts of climate change. As the recent International Energy Authority report highlights, the world is currently slipping off the path to meet the below two degree target set in Copenhagen two years ago. This means wealthy developed countries must take action to reduce carbon emissions to levels that are based on the science. Australia is planning on cutting emissions by at least five per cent by 2020 on 2000 levels. The IPCC recommends developed countries reduce emissions by between 25 per cent and 40 per cent by 2020 on 1990 levels.

Advertisement

The IPCC also warns that sectors that are closely linked to the climate and Australia’s prosperity, like water, agriculture, tourism, health and food security, will be severely affected. Acting on climate change is in our national interest. It will also ensure that Reverend Tafue and the people of Tuvalu can avoid the worst impacts of climate change.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Article edited by Jo Coghlan.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

55 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Clancy Moore is attending the U.N Climate Summit in Durban, South Africa form 28 November to 9 December 2011 as part of Oxfam's U.N. Climate Change Tracker Project.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 55 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy