Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. HereÔŅĹs how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Caught between a rock and a hard place, Australia canít just dig its way out

By Shahar Hameiri and Toby Carroll - posted Wednesday, 30 November 2011

Is the resources boom good or bad for Australia? It is hard to argue the latter when Australia is among a handful of major developed economies still growing.

But the rarely contested notion that the resources boom is Australia's saviour deserves serious critical scrutiny.

While Australia appears to have so far escaped the ravages of the deep economic and political crisis now afflicting Europe and the US, the resources boom creates massive problems domestically and externally.


Domestically, the resources boom means that more than ever the wealth of the few comes at the expense of the many – a situation all-too-familiar in the US and parts of Europe. This is partly because of the usual pitfalls inherent in resource-led growth, but largely to do with the historical processes of social and political change that took place in Australia and around the world in the decades leading up to the current boom – whereby in the name of comparative advantage, precarious employment and rising inequality were tolerated.

As the vast academic literature on the 'resource curse' and the popularisation of terms like the 'Dutch disease' show, resource-led growth is often associated with a decline in other parts of the economy, erratic growth patterns, highly uneven economic development geographically, deepening wealth and income disparities, and in many poor countries, even conflict and war. Indeed, on this last point, in the undeveloped world, natural resources are often central to the rise and consolidation of pernicious elites and bitter contestations over elite power.

While Australia has of course been spared internal conflict it has not avoided many of the other by-products of intensive resource exploitation. For one, the rising value of the Australian dollar – whose fortunes have for some time been linked to the market value of Australia's main export commodities and, not unrelated, considerable speculative activity – has placed significant pressure on non-resource exporting sectors.

Notably, sectors that are both big export earners and big employers, such as higher education (our number 3 earner), tourism (number 5) and manufacturing, are made less competitive internationally by a strong dollar. For example, this is reflected in the declining rates of enrolment by foreign students in our universities.

In contrast, the booming resources sector – which is now overwhelmingly our biggest export earner, generating $135 billion or just shy of half all of our export earnings in 2010 – employs no more than 2 per cent of the Australian workforce.

Yet it is not only existing jobs in, and the profitability of, non-resource sectors that is at stake, but how to develop an economy that is economically sustainable and which adds social value. The latter is important in terms of maintaining a high quality of living based upon social cohesion and obviating vulnerabilities; the former is crucial given that our economy is heavily dominated by the simple exploitation of exhaustible bulk commodities.


And for those that think that in Australia, endowed with 7.5 million square kilometres, talking about the exhaustion of mineral resources is a tad dramatic, think again. Journalist and researcher Paul Cleary, among others, has suggested in his recently published book, Too Much Luck,that our national resource wealth may well be spent within as little as forty years.

All of this demands that we rapidly harness the resources boom towards the development of more sustainable industries, which will provide broad employment opportunities with decent pay. Otherwise, the rundown shells of Macmansions in sprawling, largely deserted, suburbs (a scene now readily apparent in the US) will be all that is left to tell the story of Australia's riches.

Although the government's much diluted mining 'super profits' tax – the Mining Resource Rent Tax – has recently been passed in the House of Representatives, it is obvious that it will not do much to correct the imbalances generated by the boom, not least because of the federal government's scandalous agreement – indicative of the incommensurate clout of the mining lobby in Canberra – to compensate mining companies for increases in State royalties.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

4 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Shahar Hameiri researches development issues at the Asia Research Centre, Murdoch University.

Senior Research Fellow in the Centre on Asia and Globalisation at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Shahar Hameiri
All articles by Toby Carroll

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 4 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy