Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Is the Pope catholic?

By David James - posted Wednesday, 28 September 2005


When just 31 years of age, Ratzinger was made Professor of Fundamental Theology at Freising seminary (after he verbally defended his thesis in Latin). As Prefect of the CDF, Ratzinger provided much of the intellectual leadership for Pope John Paul II’s papacy, the tenor of which, Collins argues, was to steer the church towards a closed certainty and away from the openness promulgated by the Second Vatican Council.

When made a cardinal, in 1972, Ratzinger chose as his motto, “Fellow worker in the truth” because, as he explained at the time, “… in today’s world the theme of truth has all but disappeared … and yet everything falls apart if there is no truth”. The emphasis on the need for certainty shines through, and it was this that he defended as the Prefect of the CDF.

What of the second criterion of Catholicity, “inclusive and open to various cultures”?

Advertisement

Ratzinger has born in rural Bavaria, which Collins reports is “completely Catholic. So in his childhood and youth, Ratzinger had no experience of living with other faiths or religious pluralism.” He followed his older brother Georg (also a priest) into the high school seminary at just 11-years-old.

The seminary was closed down in late 1942 and Ratzinger, like all his peers, was forced to join the Hitler Youth. After spending time on the Hungarian border preparing tank traps for the advancing Russians, he was back at the seminary by the autumn of 1945. And in a real sense, Collins shows, he has never really left.

As an aside, Collins is contemptuous of any tabloidesque opprobrium attached to Ratzinger by his having been yet another child victim of Hitler. Collins points out that Ratzinger’s parents’ attitude was strongly anti-Nazi, “specifically because the regime attacked the church and tried to replace Catholicism with an ideology of race”.

Bring Ratzinger’s intellectual bent and narrow upbringing together and we are not surprised to learn that he is “essentially a theologian” who is conservative, even veering towards fundamentalist. Ratzinger, with Balthasar and others, founded the scholarly review Communio, in 1972, to counter the progressive views of Concilium.

Both Ratzinger and Balthasar are essentially intellectuals who view the world from a cultured, scholarly and abstract non-experiential perspective. Both are influenced by fathers of the church and they look back to them as a resource to be recovered today. Both identify openness to the world, the kind of approach espoused by the [Second Vatican] Council … as dangerous because it … runs the risk of losing a specific Christian identity (emphasis added).

Collins mounts a case (or, perhaps simply observes) that Ratzinger and his fellow travellers within the church hierarchy have been steering the once universal Catholic Church towards a narrow, elitist, sectarianism. Collins view is that Ratzinger et al “… never engage with or attempt to understand, as does the historian, the ‘stuff’ of history, the people and processes, the unpredictability and serendipity. Their tendency is to ‘absolutise’, to turn history into ideology.”

Advertisement

This frame of mind, Collins suggests, “was why Ratzinger reacted so badly to the student radicalism and riots of 1967-68. … Ratzinger says he was horrified, and no doubt he was. He says that he increasingly came to see this lack of respect for authority and the constant demand for more rights, for example gay rights, as symptomatic of the abandonment of Catholic teaching and moral standards.” So much for Ratzinger’s “(3) ability to bridge generations and historical periods”.

The conclusion seems inescapable: Benedict XVI is Catholic, with a capital “C” rather than catholic, in the sense of seeking to a truly universal, ecumenical, inclusive approach to the world. Of course, whether this is a good or a bad thing depends on your own point of view.

It would be wrong to deduce from this that Collins is pessimistic about "God’s New Man", far less the prospects of the Catholic Church in the new millennium. Collins is no Latham, who seems to have thrown out the Labor party bathwater, baby and all.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

59 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

David E. James is based in Brisbane, Australia and is currently writing I Just Want My Children to be Happy as a father of three young people. It is due for publication in 2006.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by David James

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 59 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy