Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The deindustrialisation of the Australian economy

By Bill Lucarelli - posted Thursday, 22 September 2011


Competition from Japan and later from the East Asian Newly Industrialised Countries (NICs), has gradually displaced domestic manufacturing by cheaper imports. The policies of trade liberalisation have effectively condemned Australia as an exporter of commodities in the global market. The possible onset of adverse terms of trade with the end of the mining boom, will blow out the current account deficit and net foreign debt because of the lack of import substitution in manufactures, most notably in the capital-goods sector.

The openness of the Australian economy has also ensured that within this structural remoulding it has shared the short-term oscillations of the world economy. This boom-bust syndrome has been closely synchronised with international trade cycles.

As Australia has increased its share of manufactured imports and foreign investment over the past two decades, the structural imbalance has worsened. Each business cycle recovery has encountered the balance of payments constraint, which manifests itself in a cumulative increase in the current account deficit. A self-perpetuating cycle of low levels of domestic investment to generate endogenous saving has only increased Australia’s dependence on international capital inflows.

Advertisement

Consequently, Australia’s net foreign debt has gradually increased and now exceeds 60 per cent of GDP. Since the foreign debt is largely denominated in US dollars, the “valuation” effect of a nominal depreciation of the Australian dollar will have the effect of increasing the value of Australia’s private and public debt.

A cursory analysis of the composition of Australia’s foreign debt reveals the following attributes:

1.    75 per cent of the net foreign debt has been incurred by the private sector;

2.    The domestic financial sector has intermediated an increasing amount of the foreign borrowing since financial deregulation in the early 1980s;

3.    60 per cent of Australia’s gross foreign debt is denominated in foreign currencies and about 60 per cent of this is denominated in the US dollar; and

4.    The debt/equity ratio of the foreign debt has risen sharply and has been accompanied by a decline in the maturity of the debt which places greater strains on the ability to service outstanding foreign debt.

Advertisement

In other words, foreigners are financing Australia’s current trade deficit by acquiring domestic assets. Overseas investment in Australia is growing faster than Australian investment abroad, which means that Australia relies more heavily on the importation of capital. Foreign investors acquire a return on their investment that appears in the balance of payments as a negative entry in the net income component of the current account. Over the past 20 years, Australia has become more dependent on the inflow of foreign investment.

This severe external imbalance emerged during the era of the neoliberal ascendancy from the early 1980s onward. The basic theoretical contention of this strategy was that market liberalisation and deregulation would induce an increase in the level of productive investment and economic restructuring through the purgative forces induced by competition.

The whole strategy hinged on the dismantling of national forms of regulation, protectionism and state support for local industries. The fatal flaw of the neo-liberal program, however, was the lack of a coherent structural policy to encourage industrial upgrading and technological reconversion. After three decades of economic “reform,” the evidence suggests that Australia’s export sector resembles that of an upper-middle income developing country. The implications would appear to be quite dire in the long run.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Bill Lucarelli is senior lecturer in the School of Economics and Finance at the University of Western Sydney.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Bill Lucarelli

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy