Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Is the term ‘bias’ useful to understanding the media?

By Richard Fitzgerald - posted Tuesday, 20 September 2011


The amount of speculation in news programs and news outlets is vast and all of it has an angle, all has a potential agenda setting role. Agenda setting is not telling people what to think but giving people something to think about. It is the topic of debate for the day that is the agenda, does being in control of setting this agenda obscure other topics.

Again the subtlety and dynamics of agenda setting needs to be examined and understood. All media may legitimately strive to set the days' news agenda. For example, talkback programs in Australia and the BBC Radio 4 Today programme in the UK work hard at this as it promotes their own media capital. Questions around the extent and influence of agenda setting need to take account of market capital both as symbolic and economic.

In the institutional realm the relationship between politics and media a 'free press' is at the heart of a functioning democracy. Owners of media have the right and indeed the duty in many respects to promote their audiences values.

Advertisement

Increasingly understanding a news outlet's niche audience is vital to survival and possibly the only business model in town. A commercial media that losses sight of its audience will not survive long, just as a publicly funded media that loses sight of its public service role will have this quickly pointed out.

So where does this leave the state of the media and its relationship to political process and influence?

Much of the heightened awareness of media influence has come from the recent News of the World revelations and the relationship between Murdoch's news empire and its commercial dominance in Australia. Jumping to conclusions about the nature and extent of the any influence or practice may not be warranted, though I am enjoying the Australian's various but amusingly consistent responses to Robert Manne's essay.

In the end it would seem healthy to examine media and political relationships and hold them up to scrutiny every so often. However, to focus on bias as a major term of reference does not seem to get us further than high school media studies.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Richard Fitzgerald lectures in the School of Journalism and Communication, University of Queensland.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy