Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Naming and shaming - getting rid of age prejudice

By Malcolm King - posted Monday, 5 September 2011


According to a 2010 National Seniors Report, called Age Discrimination in Employment, 'The Elephant in the Room', women are particularly vulnerable to age discrimination.

Middle-aged women attempting to enter the paid labour force after an absence due to family responsibilities are rejected on the grounds of lack of experience, whereas age was the real reason. Older women are rejected on the grounds of being over-qualified.

This double bind problem creates a subclass of highly vulnerable workers, subjected simultaneously to ageism and sexism.

Advertisement

Not quite like a Virgin

In 2005 eight experienced female flight attendants aged between 36 and 56 bought a complaint against Virgin Airlines in the Queensland Anti-Discrimination Tribunal. They had had been unsuccessful applicants for steward positions. All had extensive experience with Ansett.

The complainants successfully argued that Virgin Blue (as it was called then) encouraged a work culture that equated youth and its outward physical manifestations with the ability to have fun. The Court found that the youthful assessors identified with people who were the same age and had similar experiences, and therefore unconsciously, but invariably, preferred younger people.

The complainants also successfully contended that the assessment procedure was essentially a beauty contest, an elaborate ruse to mask an intentional choice by the assessors of the most physically attractive employees (male or female).

They women won their complaint but they still didn't get the jobs.

The time has come to name and shame these employers who are stuck in the past. Call their bluff in the daily papers and on TV news. I can assure you there are enough older reporters who would relish an age discrimination brief.

Advertisement

Conclusion

Potentially everyone that is born in Australia may be a victim of age prejudice. Age prejudice denies full participation to an important section of the community and leads to intergenerational tension.

A socially just society not only epitomizes the 'fair go', but must include those who want to work, whether they are old or young.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Malcolm King is a journalist and professional writer. He was an associate director at DEEWR Labour Market Strategy in Canberra and the senior communications strategist at Carnegie Mellon University in Adelaide. He runs a writing business called Republic.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Malcolm King

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy