The girl was taken to the local hospital and subjected to a full
examination during which internal swabs, nail clippings, pubic hair and
blood samples were taken. The swabs and samples were sent to the John
Tonge Centre for analysis. Although the sheet and pillowcase from the
crime scene were not tested for DNA, the vaginal swabs revealed semen that
resulted in a DNA profile of the victim. The swabs were tested for male
DNA but no male DNA was obtained
The absence of incriminating scientific evidence caused the police to
collect other evidence to fill the gaps. A second statement was taken from
the victim after she changed her earlier version of events. In that
statement she named Frank Button as the rapist. Police typed her new
answers into a radically altered version of events.
Police also took a statement from Frank Button's nephew, Lester Malone,
who claimed Button had confessed the rape to him while they were in a park
shortly after Button had been charged. Malone's statement fell apart when
it was revealed that Button went straight to jail after he was charged and
the confession in the park couldn't have possibly occurred. Malone later
withdrew his statement and claimed in court the investigating detective
had intimidated him and put words in his mouth, a claim the detective
denied.
Advertisement
The case against Button relied heavily on the testimony of the young
victim whose evidence was confused and contradictory. A school guidance
counsellor testified that she had a mental age of eight or nine and an IQ
half that of her peers. The trial judge also commented that her memory and
knowledge of the events were limited but in the end it was up to the
all-white Kingaroy jury to decide what to believe. They believed the girl.
Frank Button was sentenced to seven years imprisonment. At the Arthur
Gorrie Correctional Centre, Wacol, he became the target of violence and
brutal rape by other mainstream prisoners. Although prison authorities
placed Button in protective custody the violent abuse continued because he
was classed as a 'rock spider' - a prisoner accused of sex crimes against
children. When Button maintained his innocence and refused to do a sex
offender's course, Queensland prison authorities told him he lacked
remorse and would serve the entire seven years without remission.
His legal team requested further DNA testing of the vaginal swabs and
the bed linen from the crime scene. When scientists at the John Tonge
Centre re-tested the semen taken from the young victim, a male DNA profile
was finally discovered. That discovery resulted in the DNA testing of the
bed linen, which revealed traces of semen matching the profile on the
swab. The DNA profile from the swab and the bed-sheet was then entered
into a database of DNA samples taken from prisoners and a match was
recorded. The DNA profile on both the bed-sheet and the swab from the
victim was not Button's, it belonged to a prisoner doing time for another
rape. He was a youth from the girl's community who had been convicted of a
separate assault.
The biologist who did the DNA testing was cross-examined by Button's
counsel and asked why he hadn't tested the bed linen prior to the trial. A
forensic examination would have clearly established Button's innocence
because the semen on the bed linen did not contain Button's DNA profile.
According to the ABC's Four
Corners, the biologist answered: "The tests were directed to
try and implicate your client."
On April 12, 2001 the Queensland Court of Appeal immediately ordered
Button's release from prison after the new DNA evidence established he was
innocent of the rape. The court's judgment contained a blistering
criticism of the Queensland criminal justice system:
"Today is a black day in the history of the administration of
criminal justice. What is of major concern to this court is the fact that
that evidence was not available at the trial. This court can do little so
far as compensation to the appellant for the fact that he has had to
suffer the ignominy of a conviction for rape which now proves to be
entirely false."
Advertisement
3) On 25 April 1997 Marc Andre Renton, 30, was convicted in Southport
District Court, Queensland, Australia, of robbing the Biggera Waters and
Paradise Point National banks.
Renton was arrested by Queensland police at Runaway Bay on 19 June 1996
and was originally charged with three bank robberies at Morningside,
Biggera Waters and Paradise Point but a District Court jury acquitted
Renton of the Morningside robbery.
Another accused, Brunetta Festa, 35, was also charged in relation to
the Biggera Waters and Paradise Point bank robberies in what the
Queensland news media dubbed "The Bonnie and Clyde Robberies".
The strength of the Crown case against Renton relied upon DNA evidence
delivered by Kenneth Joseph Cox, forensic scientist at The John Tonge
Centre, which the Crown argued was conclusive and irrefutable proof that
established Renton's guilt in relation to the Biggera Waters bank robbery.
This is an edited version of a paper examining the
difficulties of DNA evidence. The full text is available here.
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.
2 posts so far.