Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The hidden cost of maternity leave

By David Baker - posted Wednesday, 20 July 2011


The effect varies dependent upon the level of education a women has attained and the number of years in the workforce. Higher education or greater years of work experience both result in a lower average wage-penalty effect over three years.

There is little public discussion in Australia about the long-run cost incurred by women as a result of the wage-penalty effect of taking maternity leave. Because of this, the reasonably abstract concept of a wage penalty is unlikely to figure prominently in people's decisions about the duration of maternity leave they take.

It is important, therefore, that the government measure the future costs that is associated with taking maternity leave and consider the policy options available to ensure that women are not disadvantaged by taking this important initiative.

Advertisement

This paper uses unit record data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey. The HILDA Project was initiated and is funded by the Australian Government Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (FaHCSIA) and is managed by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research (Melbourne Institute). The findings and views reported in this paper, however, are those of the author and should not be

attributed to either FaHCSIA or the Melbourne Institute.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

 

This paper uses unit record data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey. The HILDA Project was initiated and is funded by the Australian Government Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (FaHCSIA) and is managed by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research (Melbourne Institute). The findings and views reported in this paper, however, are those of the author and should not be attributed to either FaHCSIA or the Melbourne Institute.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

38 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

David Baker is a Research Fellow at The Australia Institute, a Canberra-based think tank, and is co-author of the report Reining it in: executive pay in Australia available at www.tai.org.au

Other articles by this Author

All articles by David Baker

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 38 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy