Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

More to a dog than tricks

By Malcolm King - posted Tuesday, 5 July 2011


In 40 tests Rico got it right 37 times, demonstrating he had a vocabulary comparable to dolphins, apes, sea lions and parrots that have undergone extensive training.

The researchers then repeated the test. This time they put seven of Rico's toys in the other room along with one toy he had never seen. His owner called out the unfamiliar name of the new toy.

Rico correctly retrieved the new item seven out of ten times. Rico demonstrated, at least on those tests, that he could perform simple logic.

Advertisement

This feat suggests that dog owners, who claim their pets understand what their masters are saying and are trying to respond, may be right.

Yet we have to be careful about findings such as this. At the turn of the 20th century a horse named Clever Hans that supposedly could add and subtract became infamous when researchers showed the stallion was really just responding to subtle cues from his owner.

Researchers have replicated Rico's success in a number of other dogs but if you try this at home with your pooch, you may be disappointed. It appears that the experiment only works in a small minority of canines.

Even so, this research poses some interesting questions. Can dogs distinguish between accidental and intentional actions? Does a dog understand that a picture is both an object, and an object that refers to another object?

Researchers in the US and Europe are currently putting our four legged friends through these tests to try and find the answers.

If a dog can understand that a picture of a bone is just a picture, then we are one step closer to being really able to, as Doctor Doolittle sang, 'talk to the animals' – or at least the domestic dog.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Malcolm King is a journalist and professional writer. He was an associate director at DEEWR Labour Market Strategy in Canberra and the senior communications strategist at Carnegie Mellon University in Adelaide. He runs a writing business called Republic.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Malcolm King

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy