Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Key Greenhouse Response Strategy in Energy and Transport for Australia: A Discussion Paper

By Mark Diesendorf - posted Sunday, 15 October 2000


3.17 Create incentives for ownership and use of low-speed electric motor-assisted vehicles, such as scooters and buggies, with power outputs of motors up to 250 watts.

4. Local Governments

The role of local government could be substantial, since it is responsible for approving building plans, construction of minor roads and parking areas, and the choice of locations of many of the main local travel destinations.

Advertisement

4.1 Implement energy ratings and energy efficiency standards for all new and renovated buildings, and eventually all buildings, as mandated by the States (see Actions 3.4 & 3.5).

4.2 Require a solar or natural gas hot water system to be installed in every proposal for a new or substantially renovated residential building, as currently required by Leichhardt Council in Sydney.

4.3 With the additional federal funding from Cities for Climate Protection (proposed above) and State funding from financial savings (proposed above), develop integrated local transport/land use planning and implementation, including:

  • local traffic demand management;
  • bicycle paths and bicycle parking;
  • pedestrian access and public places to sit outdoors;
  • locations and prices of car parking areas;
  • orientation of new streets and housing blocks;
  • locations of new public buildings, shopping centres and commercial/employment centres;
  • incentive programs for local businesses to monitor, benchmark and reduce GHG emissions;
  • facilitation of community processes and negotiations with private bus companies that nominally serve the locality.

4.4 If the additional CCP funding (Actions 2.7 & 4.3) is insufficient, enact specific environmental levies on rates.

Conclusion

Advertisement

Based on decades of experience in the fields of sustainable energy and urban transport, I believe that in the long run the above key actions can achieve the 50% GHG reduction target. Research is in progress at the Institute to estimate the economic costs and benefits of the key actions. Since some of the actions only involve regulation, institutional change and changes to price structures, they will cost little in economic terms to implement. Indeed, it appears that most of the proposed actions could be funded from other proposed actions, without the implementation of a carbon tax or equivalent. However, the tax will be needed in the long run to ensure that all actions are implemented while creating new jobs and maintaining social equity.

Local government would of course have to receive a share of these cost savings to implement its GHG reduction programs. In addition, it could enact specific environmental levies on rates. All spheres of government, businesses and households will achieve direct financial savings by implementing energy management programs for their own operations.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. All

This is an edited extract of Mark Diesendorf's paper. The author welcomes feedback and discussion of the full paper, which can be viewed on the ISF website. Please also direct any discussion to our forum.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Mark Diesendorf is Deputy Director of the Institute of Environmental Studies, UNSW. Previously, at various times, he was a Principal Research Scientist in CSIRO, Professor of Environmental Science at UTS and Director of Sustainability Centre Pty Ltd. He is author of about 80 scholarly papers and the book Greenhouse Solutions with Sustainable Energy. His latest book is Climate Action: A campaign manual for greenhouse solutions (UNSW Press, 2009).

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mark Diesendorf
Related Links
Department of Environment and Heritage
Department of Transport and Regional Services
Institute for Sustainable Futures
University of Technology Sydney
Photo of Mark Diesendorf
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy