Changing the gender paradigm: it’s women’s work

French thinker and philosopher Michel Foucault suggested that we conduct our lives under the largely unacknowledged control of what he identified as "truth regimes." A truth regime is a construct of political and economic forces that command majority power in society, with which we are obliged to conform to varying degrees, if we want to be accepted.

Among other things, truth regimes circulate statements that are prescriptions for the "natural" order of things. An example is the dominant concept of "natural" and "normal" expressions of masculinity and femininity. These are actually constructed through the gendering process, they are not "natural," and they are "normalized" by the truth regime. They are observably fluid, yet capitalist culture promotes essentialist beliefs about what is inherently male or female, and how those qualities are to be enacted and presented.

We live in the grip of a dominant truth regime that even before birth dictates the roles we'll play and our value, based on our genitals. Feminists have railed against this regime for decades, and while some advances have been made, one only has to walk into a baby shop to see how far we still have to go. The casting of newborns into value-laden gender roles can't help but influence an infant's future, and the values society will attach to her or him.

What we need is a paradigm shift, and they are notoriously difficult to achieve, particularly when profits are involved. The market makes big money from the exploitation of sexual difference, as human beings are commodified from pre birth until we no longer actively engage in gendered consumption.

While girls learn from the beginning of their lives that their appearance is as or more important than anything they achieve, and while boys learn that what they can accomplish is what really matters, we will continue to live in a world of inequality in the workplace.

The dominant truth regime works to first define girls as objects of the gaze, and then to nurture them as such. It is politically and economically expedient to do this. Any girl and woman who wishes to be valued primarily for something other than her appearance and femininity has first to overcome the powerful conditioning from which she has learned that her primary role is to be looked at.

Anyone who doesn't believe this is still the case needs only to glance at popular cultural representations of women in magazines and television, especially representations of young women in the workplace.

This conditioning negatively affects boys, who learn early on to see girls primarily as objects of their gaze, and thus have a great deal of difficulty in accepting women in the workplace as equals, and women's work as of equal importance.

As Foucault also observes, power always creates resistance. Challenging truth regimes is a subversive and at times revolutionary act, an attempt to claim enough majority power to create a contesting truth.

Resistance to a powerful gender paradigm that cripples both women and men has sporadically flourished now for decades, driven by feminism. From time to time there are signs that this resistance is very much alive, as evidenced recently by the Fair Work Australia decision to address the devaluing of some of the work done by women. This is a watershed decision, and indicates that we are still very much engaged in the difficult process of paradigm change.

Ironically, it's probably women who hold the key to the radical changes we need. Mothers are usually the primary influence in the infant's life, and carry the main responsibility for initially imposing gendered roles the infant will come to learn are "natural."

It's difficult to see how there can be the tectonic shifts of perception we need to attain gender equality, without women taking a long hard look at how we collude with our own oppression, by embracing a truth regime that fundamentally portrays gender inequality as a "natural" consequence of our sex.