Yet the guidelines are a substantial step forward in promoting justice. In the US, forty-eight states have DNA innocence-testing legislation; in Australia only Queensland and New South Wales have guidelines. More must and will be done, and these guidelines have started us on the right path.
Time is of the essence. The Queensland guidelines tacitly acknowledge that despite the state's sophisticated criminal justice system, wrongful convictions occur – and no one wins when an innocent person is incarcerated. These guidelines will finally allow some of the wrongly convicted people in Queensland to use DNA to prove their innocence.
Our students are a success, too. A system is made up of rules, but people make those rules. I am confident some of our students will be among those who will make a difference for the better when they join the workforce.
Advertisement
As the film Conviction highlights, exonerations are never easy and almost always involve a long, hard-fought battle. Prisoners are some of the most disadvantaged and disempowered people in society, and those who claim innocence are easy to ignore. The project will continue to fight for proper investigation of claims, to correct errors and support reforms to reduce the potential for wrongful convictions. It will work to assist those who are wrongly convicted to make visible their innocence.
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.
13 posts so far.
About the Author
Lynne Weathered is a lecturer and convenor of the Griffith University Innocence Project, initiated and supported by Nyst Lawyers partners Chris Nyst and Jason Murakami. She is also a member of the board of the International Innocence Network. The views expressed in this article are hers, and not necessarily those of the project or network.