Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

For budgets only smaller is tougher

By Mikayla Novak - posted Tuesday, 10 May 2011


However there is the prospect, at least in the short term, that the government may end up expending additional funds either upon potentially ineffectual education and training programs for welfare dependents or, worse still, on additional bureaucrats to oversee the changes.

The far greater question that can only be answered in this week's Budget is whether Prime Minister Gillard and Treasurer Swan are prepared to go much further and instigate meaningful expenditure reductions to ratchet down the size of the commonwealth government.

I suspect that, on this score, we may be heading for disappointment.

Advertisement

When it comes to some of the expenditure cuts already identified, or speculated upon, it is possible that the government is gearing up to play the old political trick of announcing less severe cuts, or none at all, on Budget night, in an effort to boost its flagging electoral popularity.

One can also expect the Budget to contain its fair share of fiscal gimmickry, including the conflation of revenue increases, such as the flood levy piggybacking the personal income tax structure, as budget 'savings.'

Similarly, the Budget papers might also include 'phantom' expenditure reductions such as the recent announcement that the Defence Department will be required to cut 1,000 intended, but yet to be filled, vacancies over the next three years.

Even before the Treasurer rises to his feet on Budget night, the government's self portrait as a tough budget taskmaster will also be cruelled by a cash splash of election promises expected to total more than $540 million over four years.

More fundamentally, it is doubtful that this government has the political constitution to cut back the size of the public sector to any great extent when that could incur the wrath of its public sector union voter base and reverse its own legacy of big spending.

During 2008-09 the Rudd government spent an unprecedented $80 billion over the forward estimates in an effort to avert an Australian recession during the global financial crisis (GFC).

Advertisement

In that year federal government payments blew out to $316 billion, an increase of $44.2 billion on the previous year. This included the extra public servants to oversee the GFC fiscal stimulus, as well as the fulfilment of 2007 election promises.

Adjusted for inflation this spending outcome was equivalent to a staggering 13 per cent increase, which has only been exceeded by Whitlam's 1974-75 budget which increased its expenditure levels by 20 per cent compounding the bitter effects of stagflation.

Any allusions that the government would maintain a fiscally conservative stance, as promised by former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd during the 2007 election, were greatly diminished as a result of its big spending venture.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All
Advertisement
 Institute of Public Affairs Advertisement

 

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mikayla Novak is a Research Fellow with the Institute of Public Affairs. She has previously worked for Commonwealth and State public sector agencies, including the Commonwealth Treasury and Productivity Commission. Mikayla was also previously advisor to the Queensland Chamber of Commerce and Industry. Her opinion pieces have been published in The Australian, Australian Financial Review, The Age, and The Courier-Mail, on issues ranging from state public finances to social services reform.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mikayla Novak

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Latest from Institute of Public Affairs
 No reality holiday from this population challenge
 For budgets only smaller is tougher
 Government subsidies to green groups must end
 Boot-strapping on a carbon tax
 West's history not complete without reference to Christianity
 More...
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy