Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Ideals and interests coalesce in Libya

By Antoun Issa - posted Monday, 4 April 2011


That Washington has been unable to stem popular uprisings (not the first in recent history) threatening a region of US-backed despots signals that the end of American hegemony in the region is drawing near.

It is with this understanding, thus, that we must distinguish Libya from the Iraq invasion. The conflict in Libya arose from a local push for reform and democracy. Much credit must be given to the domestic agents in the Arab world that have risen against their tyrants en masse out of frustration at a lack of freedom and economic opportunity.

Western intervention has been aimed at reinforcing such a drive in Libya that was extremely close to total annihilation at the hands of Gaddafi.

Advertisement

This differs significantly from Iraq, where the project was initiated, drafted and implemented completely by external forces. Little engagement of domestic agents was sought, as the Bush administration pushed to impose his New Middle East agenda on Iraq.

There is no such imposition in Libya, but instead a unique union of ideals and interests that have enabled military intervention to take place.

The Libyan conflict is a rare occasion where Arab popular demands and Western idealism and interests are on the same side, thus highlighting the need to contextualise each case. One does not and should not expect the West to apply a similar policy in the Persian Gulf as it does in Libya, as each conflict presents its own opportunities and consequences, which need to be weighed individually.

Regardless of what interests are at stake for the West in Libya, it appears an old perception of its role as the world policeman is part of the driving force in its decision to intervene. It is also a signal to other emerging powers that the West is determined to ensure its liberal democratic values continue to underpin international norms and expectations in the 21st century.

Although the notion of a Western global policeman might be dismissed as outdated international political logic in Moscow and Beijing, it appears to be doing its job in Libya – albeit a rare occasion of commendable action by the West.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

1 post so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Antoun Issa is an Australian-based freelance political writer, Global Voices Online author, and commentator on international affairs, with a specific interest in Middle Eastern issues.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Antoun Issa

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 1 comment
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy