Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Sweden no model for sex laws

By Elena Jeffreys - posted Thursday, 17 March 2011


Now a corruption investigation has been launched against one of the supporters and instrumental voices in these harsh policing tactics – a Yarra City Council compliance officer and supporter of the Greg Barber and Kathleen Maltzahn approach has allegedly used the laws to their advantage.

Sex workers know such policies breed corruption. Unfortunately, engagement with police in criminalised environments is also a common experience among sex workers in Australia. From the NSW Woods Royal Commission to the Neave Inquiry in Victoria, corruption was proven to be rife under criminalised regimes in the last century. And it continues to be a characteristic of anti-trafficking and anti-client criminalisation.

The reality is that sex work continues, regardless of the laws, regulatory challenges, corruption, discrimination, stigma, criminalisation or social marginalisation. The question for policy makers and those trying to support sex workers is to ask: How can we remove the problems sex workers face?

Advertisement

One answer is to remove harsh laws that harm sex workers. Decriminalisation is the only way to deliver true dignity to sex workers. The Swedish model in its attempt to protect sex workers, is actually violating the basic human rights of such women. People who call themselves feminists, or advocates for workers rights, should remember that increased criminal penalties only hurt the target populations that are intended to be "saved." Recognising and rejecting the feminist "victim" complex around sex work, is vital to understanding the rights of the workforce that is affected by anti-sex work policies. Sex work is work.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

26 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Elena Jeffreys is an Anglo-Italian Australian based sex worker and PhD candidate at the University of Queensland Department of Political Science and International Studies. Elena is a former President of Scarlet Alliance, the Australian Sex Workers Association.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Elena Jeffreys
Related Links
BaySWAN USA
Brave New Man
Goran Lindberg and Sweden's dark side
Police Quiz Brothel Officer
Scarlett Alliance

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 26 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy