Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Scientific research needs our continued support and cooperation

By Neal Lane - posted Wednesday, 15 November 2000


Today, the Information Age is bringing changes to our society that are only beginning to unfold. Six years ago, "Internet" was still a word known mostly to those in S&T. In the United States the Internet economy grew at a compounded annual rate of more than 174 per cent between 1995 and 1998, as compared with 2.8 percent for the U.S. economy as a whole.

My second example: the Global Positioning System.

GPS technology grew out of pure physics research on coherent aspects of light, starting in the 1930s. By the 1950s, this research had developed extremely accurate atomic clocks, which were used to test Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. Then, the advent of space satellites, with the Soviet Union’s launch of Sputnik I in 1957, allowed scientists and engineers to envision a system of navigation that would rely on satellite signals keyed to precise timekeeping. By 1973, the Department of Defense had approved the navigational concept and Rockwell International began building the GPS satellites, each the size of a large automobile and weighing slightly less than a ton. In 1983, the first GPS receivers cost more than $150,000 and weighed more than 100 pounds. Today, a handheld GPS receiver weighing less than a pound can be purchased for less than $100. GPS receivers and transmitters may soon be smaller than credit cards – and cheap enough for use in almost any vehicle, cell phone, or pocket.

Advertisement

My third example: Biomedical Breakthroughs.

Long-term R&D investments have led not only to greater prosperity, but also have allowed us to enjoy better living conditions and greater life expectancy – and this also yields economic benefits. The United States has seen amazing changes in biomedical technologies over the past 100 years. We have come from the family doctor’s signature black bag in the first half of the century to the powerful scanning and imaging equipment of the modern medical center; from surgical saws to lasers, from X-Ray to MRI, and from an average life expectancy of about 49 years to our present expectancy of 75 years.

Just as biomedical technologies have made enormous contributions to Americans’ health and well-being in this century, the health-care industry generates roughly $1 trillion in economic activity, high-wage jobs, and trade. Another measure of economic importance of supporting biomedical R&D is the amount of money it saves: for example, improved treatment of acute lymphocytic leukemia has saved the U.S. more than $1 billion in restored lifetime earnings, and lithium treatment for manic-depressive illness has saved about $7 billion per year since its introduction in 1970.

The rapid progress in medicine has not only come from supporting the life sciences – such as biology, biochemistry and genetics – but also from physics, math, chemistry and many other fields of science and engineering. For example, over the past 25 years physicists have developed revolutionary imaging technologies that have allowed us to see deeper and deeper into the materials and processes of life itself. Much of today’s imaging technology relies on new developments in micro-processors and software. Much of tomorrow’s medical technology is likely to come from miniaturization of smart devices that will be made possible by advances in nanotechnology.

Progress against disease demands that the physical, mathematical, behavioral, and engineering sciences continue to advance in tandem with the life sciences. I cannot emphasize this point strongly enough – continued medical breakthroughs depend on strong support for R&D activities across a broad range of scientific and engineering disciplines.

Ensuring Our Future S&T Workforce

Advertisement

So with these three examples, let me take the license to simply assert that future progress will demand advances in science and technology.

But we can’t do any kind of science, technology or engineering without well trained people, from technicians to Ph.D. research scientists and engineers. In the U.S., economic and demographic trends are putting pressure on science and math education at all levels.

High-tech jobs are among the fastest growing of any job sector in the U.S. economy, to the point that demand for workers has outstripped supply. Unemployment in science and engineering occupations is about 2 percent – about half the rate for the entire U.S. workforce, which itself is at historic low levels. However, if current trends persist, our nation may not have all of the talent it will need to enable the innovation process that has provided such a strong economy and high quality of life. There is already evidence that worker shortages are limiting economic growth, and this shortage could have devastating consequences for the future.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

This is an edited version of a speech given to the National Press Club on October 31. A full transcript of the speech is available from the Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies website.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Neal Lane was Assistant to the President of the United States for Science and Technology and former Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy.

Related Links
Department of Industry, Science, and Resources
Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies website
White House Office of Science and Technology
Photo of Neal Lane
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy