Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

China's property market and the global economy

By Arthur Thomas - posted Tuesday, 1 February 2011


Banks followed government policy, implementing lending restrictions and raising interest rates and deposits on purchases of 2nd and 3rd homes.

Several cities adopted Wen Jiabao's recommendation of one new home per family, but the lack of affordable housing deters potential buyers.

Ineffective government policy

Beijing's policies to counter the oversupply of vacant overpriced property and related local government and state bank debt, are seriously flawed.

Advertisement

They failed to address affordability for owner/occupiers, and ignore implications of oversupply and investor "demand" in the top end sector.

It suggests not only failure to comprehend market dynamics, but a reluctance to implement measures that could devalue local and central government real estate interests.

Policy makers have ignored the fundamentals driving the market -

  • development motivation driven by higher profits in top end housing
  • investor demand for top end property
  • local government support for developers of top end housing and grandiose projects

As long as developers focus on the top end of the market, investment options in China are limited to the property and stock markets, and state media support of the property boom, the strategies will be ineffective.

Prestige projects have the support of local government because they attract domestic and foreign investment, and boost local GDP.

Advertisement

Motivating developers and local government to focus on building affordable housing to meet mass-market demand housing on low profit margins will be a major challenge.

In parallel to the demand for affordable mid level housing, is the huge demand for low cost housing. This comprises towns and communities forced from their homes by desertification, water shortages and natural disasters, while other communities and farmers are displaced by major infrastructure projects. Housing and commercial project developments force the relocation of thousands of others.

The mechanics and effectiveness of the repossession policy, when considering government vested interest in real estate however, remains unclear.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Arthur Thomas is retired. He has extensive experience in the old Soviet, the new Russia, China, Central Asia and South East Asia.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Arthur Thomas

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy